Calculating Proton Energy for COM and LAB Frames - Tevatron Collisions

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the energy required for a proton accelerator to achieve the same center of mass (COM) energy as that in proton-proton collisions at the Tevatron, where two beams of 1 TeV protons collide. The challenge is to determine the necessary energy when bombarding a stationary proton.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate the velocity of the protons and considers using velocity addition, but encounters difficulties due to relativistic speeds. They inquire about alternative approaches.
  • Some participants suggest algebraic methods instead of numerical calculations, discussing the concept of boosting to different frames and the use of 4-momentum in the analysis.
  • Others raise concerns about potential errors in reasoning and the importance of verifying calculations and signs in the context of relativistic physics.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with various approaches being explored. Some participants have provided guidance on algebraic methods and the use of 4-momentum, while others are questioning assumptions and seeking clarification on the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of adhering to forum rules regarding the provision of complete solutions, which may influence the level of detail shared in the discussion.

bon
Messages
547
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Tevatron carries to beams of 1 TeV protons moving in opposite directions, so that for proton-proton collisions the COM frame is also the LAB frame. What proton energy must an accelerator provide to get the same COM energy when bombarding a stationary proton

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Tried working out the velocity of the two protons, and then using velocity addition to add these to see what it would be if one were at rest...hence I could work of the KE of the single proton..

The problem is that the velocity is so close to the speed of light that my calculator won't allow me to do it this way..

is there another way to approach it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Any ideas?
 
You don't need a calculator. 1 TeV is E in the COM frame. If you want to figure out what the energy of a collision is in a different frame, just boost to that frame. That means pick one proton and boost to its frame, so it's at rest, and then compute the energy of the other proton in that frame.
 
I suggest that you do it algebraically, not with a calculator. Then you should be able to do it according to your original idea. The other benefit is that you see immediately from the formula how it would be for other values of the energy E ( = 2TeV in your case )

Otherwise, I think it can be done without using a boost, like this:

Assume that the one moving proton has a 4-momentum P1. The stationary proton's 4-momentum is denoted P2.

The total 4-momentum is therefore P = P1 + P2.

Now, the energy of two particle system in its rest frame (COM frame) is the same as the system's rest mass. This can be found by taking minus the square root of the square of P. This is analogous to the rest mass of a single particle, which satisfies P^2 = -M^2 where M is the proton rest mass.

You would demand that this is equal to E:

(P1 + P2)^2 = -E^2

thus

P1^2 + P2^2 + 2P1.P2 = -E^2

Then I use:
P1^2 = P2^2 = -M^2

and

P1.P2 = -M*sqrt(M^2+p^2)

where I used the components of the vectors P1 and P2 in the lab frame:
P1 = (sqrt(M^2+p^2), p)
P2 = (M, 0)

I have restricted to one spatial dimension, and written a lowercase p for the spatial component of the momentum.

The equation can then be reduces to:

-2M^2 - 2Msqrt(M^2+p^2) = -E^2

or

sqrt(M^2+p^2) = (E^2 - 2M^2) / 2M

But the left hand side is actually the energy of the incoming proton that has 3-momentum p, so that would be the answer to the question.

Please note that I may have made some errors here, so please check that you agree with everything yourself. Please also double-check signs. I have used the (-,+,+,+) signature. Maybe you use the opposite one. If so, you could correct for that.

Torquil
 
Last edited:
Now I'll check out the Forum Rules to see if there is a rule about helping too much...

EDIT: I see that one should not provide a complete solution, so I guess I jumped the gun here (if my solution is correct, that is).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
Replies
21
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K