MHB Calculating Real Estate Commission for $400,000 Price

  • Thread starter Thread starter chihuaha11
  • Start date Start date
chihuaha11
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My daughter has a math problem that we have been working on for 2 days and we can get the right answer or working.
The question is, a real estate agent earns commission according to the following rules:- 5% on the first \$60,000 and 2.5% on the remainder. What is the minimum price a property could sell for in order for the seller to receive \$400,000 after commission? Can anyone help us?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: need some math homework help

chihuaha11 said:
My daughter has a math problem that we have been working on for 2 days and we can get the right answer or working.
The question is, a real estate agent earns commission according to the following rules:- 5% on the first \$60,000 and 2.5% on the remainder. What is the minimum price a property could sell for in order for the seller to receive \$400,000 after commission? Can anyone help us?

Hi chihuaha11!

The basic set up goes like this: [math]P-C=400,000[/math] where P is the price of the house and C is the commission to the real estate agent. Now the question is how can we express the commission in terms of the price of the house? If the house is greater than \$60,000 then the commission is [math](0.05)(60,000)+(0.025)(P-60,000)[/math].

So substitute in the above expression for C into the first equation and solve for P. Make sense? :D

Jameson
 
Last edited:
Re: need some math homework help

hi,
thank you for your reply, but my daughter still doesn't understand. This is her working for your equations;
P- C = 400, 000 where C = (0.05x60,000) + 0.025(P-60, 000)
400, 000 = P - (0.05x60,000) + 0.025(P-60, 000)
400, 000 = P - 3, 000 + 0.025(P-60, 000)
403, 000 = P + (0.025 x P) - (0.025 x 60, 000)
403, 000 = P + (0.025 x P) - 1, 500
404, 500 = P + (0.025 x P)
This is a far as she has come and is unsure how to proceed as P appears twice in the equation.
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you
 
Re: need some math homework help

[math]400,000 = P - \left( 0.05 \times 60,000+0.025 \times (P-60,000) \right)[/math]

[math]400,000 = P - \left( 3000+0.025P-1500 \right)[/math]

[math]400,000= P - \left(0.025P+1500 \right)[/math]

[math]400,000 = P-0.025P-1500[/math]

[math]401,500=0.975P[/math]

[math]P=\frac{401,500}{0.975}=\$411,794.87[/math]
 
Re: need some math homework help

Thank you very much.
This makes so much more sense now.
I will apply this solution to a similar problem and test if i can do it myself.
Thanks again, your a legend!
 
Re: need some math homework help

If you're trying "to see by doing some yourself", go this way (in reverse!):
Code:
MSP                500,000.00
-( 60000 * .05)     -3,000.00
-(440000 * .025)   -14,000.00
                   ==========
NET                486,000.00
This would be: find Minimum Selling Price in order to net $486,000;
you can "see" how that's arrived at.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top