Calculating relative velocity -- Jumping between two moving trains

AI Thread Summary
Jumping between two moving trains is theoretically possible due to the conservation of velocity; when a person jumps, they maintain the same forward velocity as the train. However, air resistance poses a significant challenge, potentially hindering the jump and making it unsafe. The typical gap between trains in the U.S. is about 4.5 feet, which could allow for a jump but raises safety concerns. Additionally, obstacles like signal posts must be considered when attempting such a maneuver. Overall, while the physics may support the jump, practical execution is fraught with risks.
verkamp
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
two trains running parallel, same velocity. what happens if I jump from one train to another?
Relevant Equations
Vba = Vb - Va
is it possible?

I've given it quite some thought, and my conclusion was that it would be possible, cuz right after I jump, I'll still have the same velocity in the same direction as the running train?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
verkamp said:
Homework Statement: two trains running parallel, same velocity. what happens if I jump from one train to another?
Relevant Equations: Vba = Vb - Va

is it possible?

I've given it quite some thought, and my conclusion was that it would be possible, cuz right after I jump, I'll still have the same velocity in the same direction as the running train?
You will have the same velocity but there will be a wind blowing you back at the same velocity. You cannot ignore air resistance in this case, so don't try it.
 
kuruman said:
You will have the same velocity but there will be a wind blowing you back at the same velocity. You cannot ignore air resistance in this case, so don't try it.
Track separation (center to center) in the U.S. is generally 14 feet minimum (source Michigan DOT department of rail). Passenger rail cars are a bit under 10 feet side to side (source various). So that is about 4.5 feet of train to train gap measured from toe of jumping foot to heel of landing foot. Doable, but not supremely safe.

Watch out for signal posts.
 
  • Like
Likes nasu and PeroK
Looks like this experiment has been carried out, at least once...
 
Last edited:
  • Haha
Likes jbriggs444 and kuruman
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top