Calculating Resistive Force on Styrofoam Dropping from 2.00m

  • Thread starter Thread starter Gear300
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Forces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the resistive force acting on a piece of styrofoam dropped from a height of 2.00m. The problem involves understanding the dynamics of motion under the influence of gravity and resistive forces until terminal velocity is reached.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the constant b using the relationship between acceleration, velocity, and resistive forces. They express confusion about incorporating displacement and the assumption of mass. Other participants suggest using the given time to find terminal velocity and question how the equation for velocity was derived.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring the relationships between the variables involved, with some guidance provided on using time to find the constant b. There is an ongoing inquiry into the derivation of the velocity equation, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the assumption regarding the mass of the styrofoam and the complexity introduced by the non-constant acceleration during the fall. The problem is framed within the context of homework constraints, focusing on resistive forces and motion equations.

Gear300
Messages
1,209
Reaction score
9
I come back once more with a question:
So far, when it comes to resistive forces, I've only done resistance for slow moving objects in liquids and small particles through the air, along with larger objects going against heavier air resistance. This question refers to a smaller particle:

A small piece of styrofoam packing material is dropped from a height of 2.00m. Until it reaches terminal velocity (velocity when the net force is 0N), the acceleration is given as a = g - bv. After falling .500m, the styrofoam reaches terminal speed and takes 5.00s to reach the ground. I need to find the value of the constant b.

Thus far, resistance R = -bv and that mg (weight) is pulling the styrofoam down. That would imply ma = mg - bv, in which a = g - (b/m)v. Terminal velocity is when Vt = mg/b and is only approached, not reached, so the equation for v would be
v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)). The question said that a = g - bv...so I would assume m = 1kg (a bit big for styrofoam)...or do I have to come up with another equation for this? and how would I incorporate displacement into the equations if the acceleration is not constant?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Gear300 said:
I come back once more with a question:
So far, when it comes to resistive forces, I've only done resistance for slow moving objects in liquids and small particles through the air, along with larger objects going against heavier air resistance. This question refers to a smaller particle:

A small piece of styrofoam packing material is dropped from a height of 2.00m. Until it reaches terminal velocity (velocity when the net force is 0N), the acceleration is given as a = g - bv. After falling .500m, the styrofoam reaches terminal speed and takes 5.00s to reach the ground. I need to find the value of the constant b.

Thus far, resistance R = -bv and that mg (weight) is pulling the styrofoam down. That would imply ma = mg - bv, in which a = g - (b/m)v. Terminal velocity is when Vt = mg/b and is only approached, not reached, so the equation for v would be
v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)). The question said that a = g - bv...so I would assume m = 1kg (a bit big for styrofoam)...or do I have to come up with another equation for this? and how would I incorporate displacement into the equations if the acceleration is not constant?
You are making the problem complex. It is given that a = g-bv. Terminal velocity can be calculated knowing that it takes 5 seconds to travel 1.5m. What is the acceleration at terminal velocity? Solve for b.
 
I see...I get what you're saying; with the time, I can find b knowing the at some point v is approximately Vt. I have just one more question. How did they find that
v = Vt(1 - e^(-bt/m)).
 
Last edited:
I told you the other day -- by integration of the eqn of motion. You'll soon learn it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
15K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K