# Launching a Projectile with Air Resistance

• xtraboi
In summary: Sigma{F_x}\sin(\theta)$$. Couldn't you just resolve the horizontal velocity as ##v\cos(\theta)## and the vertical velocity as ##v\sin(\theta)##, and solve the differential equation for both to find x(t) and y(t)? If you were to resolve the forces as well, the ##F_{air}## in the vertical direction would be ##F_{air}\sin(\theta)##, meaning the net force in the vertical direction would be$$\Sigma{F_y} =...\Sigma{F_x}\sin(\theta)$$. xtraboi Mentor note: Moved from a technical forum section, so Homework Template is not present. Hello Physics Forums members, I am a student in AP Physics C and I was just working out the range of a projectile when air resistance is non-negligible. As of right now I'm going to use the linear model of air resistance to simplify calculations (F_air = -bv). When drawing the Free Body Diagram for the projectile, I know that the force on the object due to air resistance opposes the direction of motion, so does that mean there would be one Free Body Diagram when the projectile is going up and another when the projectile is going down? If that's the case, how would I go about finding the total range of the projectile? My approach is to use the kinematic equation v_f^2 = v_i^2 + 2*a*d twice (one for when the object is going up, and one for when the project is coming down) and substitute the acceleration as calculated from the Free Body Diagram, but I'm not sure if that's the right approach as the force due to air resistance is dependent on the instantaneous velocity at a point. I'm thinking to maybe take the average value of the force due to air resistance, but I'm not even sure what integral would achieve that as we haven't covered what I'm doing in class. Thanks in advance. In your case, acceleration is not constant, but varies with velocity. The SUVAT equations don't apply and you'll need to set up and solve a differential equation or two. theanswer2physicsisu PeroK said: In your case, acceleration is not constant, but varies with velocity. The SUVAT equations don't apply and you'll need to set up and solve a differential equation or two. Oh that makes sense. Does that mean I would take the integral of the acceleration found from the free body diagram to get v(t), and then take the integral of that to find x(t)? xtraboi said: Oh that makes sense. Does that mean I would take the integral of the acceleration found from the free body diagram to get v(t), and then take the integral of that to find x(t)? Sort of: it means you generate a differential equation and integrate that (twice). That's easier said than done, however. xtraboi said: Oh that makes sense. Does that mean I would take the integral of the acceleration found from the free body diagram to get v(t), and then take the integral of that to find x(t)? Yes Orodruin said: Yes Got it, one more question - doesn't the direction of the force due to air resistance change after the projectile reaches its maximum height? As the projectile is ascending and descending, the force due to air resistance changes direction as it opposes the direction of motion. If so, how would I account for that when solving for v(t) and x(t)? PeroK said: That's easier said than done, however. ##m\dot v = - bv - mg## seems perfectly solvable to me … the real issues start if you consider a non-linear model for air resistance… xtraboi said: Got it, one more question - doesn't the direction of the force due to air resistance change after the projectile reaches its maximum height? As the projectile is ascending and descending, the force due to air resistance changes direction as it opposes the direction of motion. If so, how would I account for that when solving for v(t) and x(t)? Yes, it changes direction when v changes sign. This is already built into the term -bv, which also changes direction when v changes sign. Orodruin said: Yes, it changes direction when v changes sign. This is already built into the term -bv, which also changes direction when v changes sign. That makes so much more sense. I never really understood the negative sign on -bv until now, so thank you so much for clearing that up, and thank you to PeroK for offering a valuable insight onto the problem Orodruin said: ##m\dot v = - bv - mg## seems perfectly solvable to me … the real issues start if you consider a non-linear model for air resistance… I think there would be a complication in two dimensions. The horizontal and vertical components of the acceleration would have to be proportional to ##\sqrt{v_x^2+v_y^2}## which yields a system of two coupled diferential equations. kuruman said: I think there would be a complication in two dimensions. The horizontal and vertical components of the acceleration would have to be proportional to ##\sqrt{v_x^2+v_y^2}## which yields a system of two coupled diferential equations. Couldn't you just resolve the horizontal velocity as ##v\cos(\theta)## and the vertical velocity as ##v\sin(\theta)##, and solve the differential equation for both to find x(t) and y(t)? If you were to resolve the forces as well, the ##F_{air}## in the vertical direction would be ##F_{air}\sin(\theta)##, meaning the net force in the vertical direction would be$$\Sigma{F_y} = -mg-bv\sin(\theta)

xtraboi said:
Got it, one more question - doesn't the direction of the force due to air resistance change ...
I would say the direction of air resistance changes continuously to oppose the continuously changing direction of the velocity.

kuruman said:
I think there would be a complication in two dimensions. The horizontal and vertical components of the acceleration would have to be proportional to ##\sqrt{v_x^2+v_y^2}## which yields a system of two coupled diferential equations.
As long as you are in the linear regime, this is not the case. This is one of the reasons you run into issues when air resistance becomes non-linear.

Edit: To expand on that. The vector form of the linear air resistance is ##\vec F = -b\vec v##. From this it is pretty clear that the components separate. All components appearing in the speed is exactly offset by the projection onto the relevant component.

Orodruin said:
As long as you are in the linear regime, this is not the case. This is one of the reasons you run into issues when air resistance becomes non-linear.

Edit: To expand on that. The vector form of the linear air resistance is ##\vec F = -b\vec v##. From this it is pretty clear that the components separate. All components appearing in the speed is exactly offset by the projection onto the relevant component.
Yes, I agree. I fired off the post in a hurry only to realize that later.

## 1. How does air resistance affect the trajectory of a projectile?

Air resistance, also known as drag, is a force that acts in the opposite direction of the projectile's motion. This force increases as the speed of the projectile increases, causing it to slow down and change its trajectory. As a result, the projectile will not travel as far as it would without air resistance.

## 2. How can air resistance be minimized when launching a projectile?

To minimize air resistance, the projectile should be streamlined and have a pointed shape. This reduces the surface area and allows the projectile to cut through the air more easily. Additionally, launching the projectile at a lower angle and with a higher initial velocity can also help reduce the effects of air resistance.

## 3. How does the mass of a projectile affect its motion when launched with air resistance?

The mass of a projectile has a minimal effect on its motion when launched with air resistance. This is because the force of air resistance is dependent on the shape and velocity of the projectile, rather than its mass. However, a heavier projectile may be less affected by wind and other external factors, resulting in a more consistent trajectory.

## 4. Can air resistance be completely eliminated when launching a projectile?

No, it is impossible to completely eliminate air resistance when launching a projectile. However, it can be reduced by using streamlined designs and launching at optimal angles and velocities. In a vacuum, where there is no air, there would be no air resistance and the projectile would travel in a straight line at a constant speed.

## 5. How does air density affect the trajectory of a projectile?

Air density, which is affected by factors such as altitude and temperature, can significantly impact the trajectory of a projectile. In denser air, there is more resistance, causing the projectile to slow down and change its trajectory more quickly. In less dense air, there is less resistance, allowing the projectile to travel further and maintain its trajectory for a longer distance.

### Similar threads

• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
402
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
741
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
39
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
24
Views
2K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
839
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
• Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
21K