MHB Calculating Scale on a School Map

  • Thread starter Thread starter Baylee1014
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Map Scale School
Baylee1014
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Not sure if this is the right category but i need help.

On a map of a school, 3 inches represents 9 feet. How many inches would represent 1 foot 6 inches?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello Baylee1014,

Yes, you have chosen the correct sub-forum in which to post your question. (Yes)

It is best though to show what you've tried or what your thoughts are on how to begin so our helpers know exactly where you're stuck or need help.

The problem is essentially stating:

$x$ inches is to 1.5 ft as 3 inches is to 9 ft.

Can you translate that into an equation which you can then solve for $x$?
 
MarkFL said:
Hello Baylee1014,

Yes, you have chosen the correct sub-forum in which to post your question. (Yes)

It is best though to show what you've tried or what your thoughts are on how to begin so our helpers know exactly where you're stuck or need help.

The problem is essentially stating:

$x$ inches is to 1.5 ft as 3 inches is to 9 ft.

Can you translate that into an equation which you can then solve for $x$?

x is equal to .5 so would it would 18 inches??
 
Yes, good work...you are right that $$x=\frac{1}{2}$$, but $x$ is in inches, not in feet.

You should know too that $x$ must be smaller than 3 inches because 1.5 is less than 9.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top