Calculating Schwarzschild Radius at Galaxy's Core

  • Thread starter Thread starter mantillab
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Core
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the Schwarzschild radius of a massive object at the center of the Milky Way galaxy, believed to be a black hole. The Schwarzschild radius formula, R_S = [2Gm]/c^2, was applied using constants such as G = 6.67 x 10^(-11), mass m = 4.26 x 10^37 kg, and speed of light c = 3 x 10^8 m/s. The correct calculation yields a Schwarzschild radius of approximately 1.89 x 10^19 m, correcting earlier miscalculations that mistakenly divided by c instead of c squared.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Schwarzschild radius formula
  • Familiarity with gravitational constant (G) and its value
  • Knowledge of the speed of light (c) and its significance in physics
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the implications of black holes in astrophysics
  • Learn about the properties and characteristics of black holes
  • Study gravitational physics and its equations
  • Explore observational techniques for detecting black holes in galaxies
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in black hole research and gravitational physics will benefit from this discussion.

mantillab
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Astronomers have observed a small, massive object at the center of our Milky Way galaxy. A ring of material orbits this massive object; the ring has a diameter of about 15 light years and an orbital speed of about 200 km/s. Take the distance of one light year to be 9.461 X 10^15 m. Mass of object = 4.26 X 10^37 kg. Speed of light (c) = 3 X 10^8 m/s. G = 6.67 x 10^(-11).

Many astronomers believe that the massive object at the center of the Milky Way galaxy is a black hole. If so, what is its Schwarzschild radius R_S?

Homework Equations



From Wikipedia, I got the equation for the Schwarzschild radius to be R_S = [2Gm]/c^2.

The Attempt at a Solution



Using the above equation and the above constants, I got 1.89 x 10^19 m, which is wrong.

Other wrong answers: 1.90×10^19 and 1.89x10^35.

Any help would be appreciated! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well it looks like you divided by c instead of c^2.
 
Doh! Thanks so much.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
8K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K