Calculating Silver Chloride Solubility at 25℃

  • Thread starter Thread starter staka
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Solubility
AI Thread Summary
The solubility of silver chloride (AgCl) at 25℃ can be calculated using its solubility product constant (Ksp), which is 1.8x10^-10. The dissociation of AgCl into Ag+ and Cl- ions leads to the equation Ksp = [Ag][Cl]. By assuming the concentrations of Ag+ and Cl- are equal, the calculation yields [Ag] = [Cl] = √(1.8x10^-10), resulting in a molar solubility of 1.3x10^-5 M for AgCl. The final conclusion is that the molar solubility of silver chloride at this temperature is 1.3x10^-5 M.
staka
Messages
23
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Calculate the solubility of silver chloride at 25℃.

Ksp of silver chloride at 25℃=1.8x10^-10

Homework Equations


AgCl⇔Ag+Cl (I believe)
So, Ksp=[Ag][Cl]

The Attempt at a Solution


All I know is the Ksp of silver chloride at that temperature. I have no idea what to do from here. Do I need to know something about Ag or Cl?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I attempted..
Ksp=1.8x10^-10
1.8x10^-10=[Ag][Cl]
[Ag]=[Cl]=√1.8x10^-10
=1.3x10^-5M

So I got the solubility for both elements.. do I just add since AgCl⇔Ag+Cl?
 
Okay, nevermind. 1.3x10^-5M is AgCl's molar solubility..
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top