Calculating Tension Using Work Energy Theorem

Click For Summary
To calculate the tension on a 17 kg object on a rough ramp using the work-energy theorem, the discussion highlights the need to consider forces, accelerations, and energy balances. The user has already determined the weight of the hanging object and calculated its velocity and angular velocity. However, confusion arises regarding how to apply the work-energy theorem to find the tension specifically for the 17 kg object. The response suggests using kinetic energy and energy balance to account for work done against friction. Overall, the application of the work-energy theorem in this context is viewed as somewhat forced.
JHLee
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Thread moved from the technical forums, so no Homework Template is shown
Hi, I have a homework and I kind of stuck on it. Here is the question:

A 17 kg object on a rough ramp (coefficient of friction = 0.35N, ramp's angle = 25 degrees) is connected to a vertically hanging object via a pulley with I = 23 kg m^2 and the radius is 0.25m. The hanging object had weight 971N. The hanging object dropped 7 meters. Find the tension on the 17 kg object using work energy theorem.

So far I've found the actual weight of the hanging object which is approximately 99kg. The velocity 4.95m/s, the acceleration 1.75m/s^2, and angular velocity 19.8m/s.

When I use the Newton's Law of motion, I could find the tension of the 17kg object equal to 330N while for the 99kg equal to 796.75N so the angular acceleration would be approximately 5 m/s^2. But the thing is, I need to find the tension of the 17kg using the work energy theorem as well but I don't know how.

Please help me? Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
JHLee said:
found the actual weight of the hanging object
Mass
JHLee said:
angular velocity 19.8m/s.
Wrong units.
JHLee said:
find the tension of the 17kg using the work energy theorem
The question is a bit strange. You had to work with forces and accelerations because of the residual velocity. But having found that, you have the KE, so you could write out the energy balance for the 17kg object to find the work done against friction.
Rather an artificial "use" of the theorem, though.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K