Calculating the Angle of Force for 0.140 kg Ball Attached to a 0.600 m String

  • Thread starter Thread starter Paulbird20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Force
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the angle of force exerted on a 0.140 kg ball attached to a 0.600 m string, which is revolving in a circular motion at a rate of 1.00 revolution per second. Participants are exploring the relationship between tension, gravitational force, and the angle of the force with respect to the horizontal.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations for the tension in the string and the angle it makes with the horizontal. Some question the assumptions made in calculating the angle, particularly regarding the use of tangent and the components of the tension force.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the calculations involved in determining the angle of the tension force. Some participants have provided insights into using free body diagrams and Newton's second law to analyze the forces acting on the ball. However, there is no explicit consensus on the correct approach to finding the angle.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraint of not ignoring the weight of the ball and are attempting to reconcile their calculations with the given parameters of the problem. There is confusion regarding the interpretation of the radius and the time for one revolution.

Paulbird20
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
Estimate the force a person must exert on a string attached to a 0.140 kg ball to make the ball revolve in a circle when the length of the string is 0.600 m. The ball makes 1.00 revolutions per second. Do not ignore the weight of the ball. In particular, find the magnitude of FT, and the angle it makes with the horizontal. [Hint: Set the horizontal component of FT equal to maR; also, since there is no vertical motion, what can you say about the vertical component of FT?]

I attached the figure below.

Ok so i did all the calculations to get the magnitude of the force and got 3.518 which is correct.

I assumed to get the angle i just do tan inverse of 3.518 which gives me 74.13. Then i minus that from 90 to get angle of 15.86 degrees. Which is not correct . Any help on how to get the angle.
 

Attachments

  • ss.gif
    ss.gif
    4.5 KB · Views: 684
Physics news on Phys.org
Paulbird20 said:
I assumed to get the angle i just do tan inverse of 3.518 which gives me 74.13.
Why assume this? (At the very least you need two sides of a triangle to come up with a tangent.) Instead, figure out the angle by considering the components of the tension, which you must have figured out to get the tension.
 
hey, could u explain how u get 3.518.. but to solve for the angle..
draw a free body diagram. Then ask yourself, is the ball accelerating down? its not. So what does this tell u? why isn't the ball accelerating down. what makes the ball stay in the same position (vertically)?
 
hmm,

to get the tension i did.

2 * 3.14* .600 / .25 =15.07

then 15.07/.600 * .140 to get 3.518 at the force.

Should i use those two end results as my components and square both then take square root of the result?
 
Paulbird20 said:
hmm,

to get the tension i did.

2 * 3.14* .600 / .25 =15.07

then 15.07/.600 * .140 to get 3.518 at the force.

Should i use those two end results as my components and square both then take square root of the result?

are you sure u are right, to those exact decimals? I am getting an answer is 3. something.. but not 3.5. does the book say 3.518?.. because i can't follow your work

where do u get that .25 from.
 
remember Ar(or Ac)=w^2r
 
Paulbird20 said:
hmm,

to get the tension i did.

2 * 3.14* .600 / .25 =15.07

then 15.07/.600 * .140 to get 3.518 at the force.

Should i use those two end results as my components and square both then take square root of the result?
I'm not following where these expression come from. Or why you think 3.518 N is the correct answer for the tension.

Redo this step by step, applying Newton's 2nd law to both vertical and horizontal force components. Start by specifying what forces act on the ball.
 
Yes 3.518 is the correct answer rounded.

I applied Newtons second to the radial direction. Horizontal of course.

V= 2* 3.14 * R / T
to get the time i divided the 1 revolution by 4 to get .25.
the radius is given as .600.
using the above formula i got 15.07 rounded. ( i used a calculator so i stored the entire data value un rounded)
then next i used
F(tension) = M * V^2 / r
Plugging in my data i arrived at the correct answer of 3.518 rounded 3 decimal places
 
Still having trouble finding the components to arrive at the degree.
 
  • #10
Paulbird20 said:
Yes 3.518 is the correct answer rounded.

I applied Newtons second to the radial direction. Horizontal of course.

V= 2* 3.14 * R / T
This makes sense for the speed.
to get the time i divided the 1 revolution by 4 to get .25.
I don't understand this: The time for 1 revolution was given as 1 second. Why divide by 4?
the radius is given as .600.
No, the length of the string was .6 m, not the radius.
using the above formula i got 15.07 rounded. ( i used a calculator so i stored the entire data value un rounded)
then next i used
F(tension) = M * V^2 / r
Plugging in my data i arrived at the correct answer of 3.518 rounded 3 decimal places
The tension acts at an angle; only the horizontal component equals the centripetal force. (Note that you ignored the weight of the ball, despite instructions not to. That's why the angle doesn't enter into your calculations.)

Draw yourself a force diagram for the ball. There are two forces acting: The tension (at some angle theta) and the weight.
 
  • #11
well.. I can tell you how to do get the degrees. But i am not sure how/why u divide the time by 4.
lets see it like this... v=wr.. right? w=2pi/1s r is .6cos(theta)--(not .6) therefore v should be 2pi(.6cos(theta))/1s..
 
  • #12
ya, doc al's explanation is more detailed.. but its the same thing
 
  • #13
i am trying to help you, but u see.. u need the FT. and If the FT is wrong.. then i don't think the degree is right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
929
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K