Calculating the Average Value of Square Spin for a Composite System

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the average value of the total square spin operator ##\hat S^{2}## for a composite system of two fermions with given spin state wave functions. Participants explore the implications of eigenvalues of the total square spin operator and the meaning of averaging in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification, Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the meaning of calculating the average value of ##S^{2}##, noting that the eigenvalues are either ##0## or ##2## and suggesting that eigenvalues represent observables.
  • Another participant clarifies that the total square spin operator's eigenvalues correspond to singlet and triplet states, indicating that the average value of ##S^{2}## could range from ##0## to ##2## depending on the probabilities of these states.
  • A later reply suggests that the spin-state wave function is not always antisymmetric and proposes that it can be expressed as a combination of antisymmetric (singlet) and symmetric (triplet) components, leading to a conjecture about the relationship between ##S^{2}## and the norm of the triplet state.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express confusion about the problem's meaning and the implications of averaging eigenvalues. While some agree on the nature of the eigenvalues and their relation to the states, the discussion remains unresolved regarding the interpretation of averaging in this context.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations regarding the assumptions about the spin-state wave functions and their symmetry properties, as well as the dependence on the probabilities assigned to different spin states.

Gvido_Anselmi
Messages
31
Reaction score
6
Hello everyone.
Let us consider two fermions whose spin state wave functions are certain (normalized) ##\psi_{1}## and ##\psi_{2}##.
So the overall normalized spin state wave function of this system is of the form:

##\psi = (1/\sqrt{2})(\psi_{1} \psi_{2} - \psi_{2} \psi_{1})##

Is there any difference between calculating the total square spin operator ##\hat S^{2}## eigenvalue and the average value of ##S^{2}##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem was to calculate average value of ##S^2## for given spin state wave functions of two electrons. Honestly I don't understand the meaning of this problem. We know that total square spin operator's eigenvalues are ##S^{2}=S(S+1)## and take values ##0## or ##2##. Eigenvalues of linear Hermitian operator are observables or average values of physical quantities by definition. So what does it mean to take average value of average value or there is something I understand wrong?
 
Last edited:
I see your confusion.

You are right that the (vector) addition of the individual spins gives us either ##S^2=0 \Rightarrow S=0## or ##S^2=2 \Rightarrow S = 1##.
Now these states correspond to the singlet and triplet states of this composite system.
The singlet state has (as the name suggests) 1 state (##S_z##).
But for the triplet state we can have spin along the z-axis ##-1,\, 0,\, +1##.

Now if you say that each of these states is equally probable i.e. the density matrix is proportional to the unit matrix.
In that case ##0\leq \langle S^2 \rangle \leq 2##, check that.
 
Gvido_Anselmi said:
The problem was to calculate average value of ##\S^2## for given spin state wave function. Honestly I don't understand the meaning of this problem. We know that total square spin operator's eigenvalues are ##S^{2}=S(S+1)## and take values ##0## or ##2##. Eigenvalues of linear Hermitian operator are observables or average values of physical quantities.
JorisL said:
I see your confusion.

You are right that the (vector) addition of the individual spins gives us either ##S^2=0 \Rightarrow S=0## or ##S^2=2 \Rightarrow S = 1##.
Now these states correspond to the singlet and triplet states of this composite system.
The singlet state has (as the name suggests) 1 state (##S_z##).
But for the triplet state we can have spin along the z-axis ##-1,\, 0,\, +1##.

Now if you say that each of these states is equally probable i.e. the density matrix is proportional to the unit matrix.
In that case ##0\leq \langle S^2 \rangle \leq 2##, check that.

Obvious! I have forgotten that spin-state wave function is not always antisymmetric. In general case we should expand it in a linear combination of antisymmetric (singlet) and symmetric (triplet) parts. I can guess that ##S^2=2P## where ##P## is the norm of triplet state and the proof is not too difficult.
Thank you very much!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K