Calculating the cosmological constant from scratch

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion outlines a method for calculating the cosmological constant using the Google calculator by leveraging known physical constants. The Hubble parameter is established at 71 km/s/Mpc, which is used to derive the critical density of the universe. The formula for critical density, 3(cH)^2/(8πG), is simplified for Google input as 3((c*71 km/s/Mpc)^2)/(8pi*G), yielding a density of approximately 0.85 joules per cubic kilometer. Additionally, the dark energy density, estimated at 75% of the total density, is calculated using 0.75*3((c*71 km/s/Mpc)^2)/(8pi*G), resulting in about 0.6 joules per cubic kilometer.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Hubble parameter and its significance in cosmology
  • Familiarity with physical constants such as the speed of light (c) and Newton's gravitational constant (G)
  • Basic knowledge of critical density and dark energy concepts
  • Ability to use the Google calculator for scientific computations
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the implications of the cosmological constant in modern cosmology
  • Learn about the role of dark energy in the expansion of the universe
  • Investigate the derivation and significance of the critical density formula
  • Study the relationship between the Hubble parameter and cosmic microwave background radiation
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physicists, students of cosmology, and anyone interested in understanding the calculations behind the cosmological constant and the universe's density.

marcus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Dearly Missed
Messages
24,752
Reaction score
795
Here is a fun thing to try

The Google calculator knows the values of pi, the speed of light c, Newton's G and stuff like that. So you can easily make it calculate the cosmological constant from a few familiar facts.

You have to know that the usual estimate of the Hubble parameter is 71 km/s/Mpc

(71 kilometers per second per Megaparsec)

from that you can easily find out the critical density and astronomers regularly take that to be the density of the universe, because it looks approximately flat.

Also they estimate that the darkenergy density is about 75 percent of the total density.

So that's all you need. You just go to Google and type in
3((c*71 km/s/Mpc)^2)/(8pi*G)

that will give the critical density, IOW the actual density of the universe, in joules per cubic meter.

Or, since the darkenergy is about 75 percent of that, you can do the whole thing at once by typing in
0.75*3((c*71 km/s/Mpc)^2)/(8pi*G)
=============================

this works fine for me. Let me know if it doesn't work for you.

The only sophisticated part of this is that the usual formula for the critical density is

\frac{3c^2 H^2}{8\pi G}

and this is translated into a form that the Google calcuator can understand
 
Space news on Phys.org
When you type
3((c*71 km/s/Mpc)^2)/(8pi*G)

into the box and press search you then Google does the calculation for you
and comes up with

8.5 x 10-10 pascal (which is the same as joules per cubic meter)

so it is telling you that the density of the universe is 0.85 joules per cubic kilometer

and then when you type

0.75*3((c*71 km/s/Mpc)^2)/(8pi*G)

into the box and press search, Google does the calculation and comes up with

6.4 x 10-10 pascal

again, one of the things that pascal can mean is joules per cubic meter, so that means the dark energy density version of the cosmological constant is

0.6 joules per cubic kilometer

=====================

It can be fun using the Google calculator because it puts the values of many of the constants in for you like c, G, hbar, k (Boltzmann constant), electron charge, mass of Earth etc etc

that way you don't have to remember those things and bother typing the numbers in, you just type in the symbol

I was reminded of this by something Robousy was asking.
 
Last edited:
I always thought it was odd that we know dark energy expands our universe, and that we know it has been increasing over time, yet no one ever expressed a "true" size of the universe (not "observable" universe, the ENTIRE universe) by just reversing the process of expansion based on our understanding of its rate through history, to the point where everything would've been in an extremely small region. The more I've looked into it recently, I've come to find that it is due to that "inflation"...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 111 ·
4
Replies
111
Views
12K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K