Calculating the distance to a star

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Dad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 replies · 1K views
Physics Dad
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
I have made an effort to answer this question, and would like to know if my thinking is correct. I would appreciate any feedback.

Thank you!


Homework Statement


Two stars in the sky have similar effective temperatures, masses and apparent brightness. However, star 1 has a surface gravity which is 10 times higher than star 2. If star 1 is 1pc away, what is the distance to star 2?

Homework Equations


i) g*=GM*/R*2
ii) f*=L*/4πd*2
iii) L*=4πR*2σT*eff4
iv) m*1-m*2=-2.5log(f*1/f*2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Based upon the question, I can assume that the mass (M*), the effective temperature (T*eff) and the apparent magnitude (m*) of both stars is the same.

First of all, I will start with the gravity which tells me that:

g*1=10g*2

so using equation i) I can say that:

GM/R*12=10GM/R*22

I can then rearrange to get a ratio of radii which will tell me that...

R*12/R*22=10-1

I can then calculate the ratio of fluxes by substituting equation iii) into equation ii),= and doing some cancelling to find that...

f*1/f*2=d*22(R*12/R*22)

I know that the value of R*12/R*22=10-1 so I can sub this value in

as I know that both apparent magnitudes are the same, I can say that m*1-m*2=0 and then sub in my ratio of fluxes to equation 4 to get...

0=-2.5log(d*22/10)

I can then solve this equation for d*2 and I get...

d*2=3.16pc

This seems feasible given that star two would have a radius 10 times bigger than star 1, but I would appreciate any help or advice anyone can offer.

Thank you!
 
on Phys.org
Physics Dad said:
d*2=3.16pc

This seems feasible given that star two would have a radius 10 times bigger than star 1, but I would appreciate any help or advice anyone can offer.

Thank you!
Answer is correct, but it imply radius ratio of 3.16, not 10. 10 is the surface areas ratio.