Calculating the distance to a star

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physics Dad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Star
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the distance to a star based on gravitational and luminosity equations. The user correctly deduces that if star 1 is 1 parsec away and has a surface gravity 10 times greater than star 2, then the distance to star 2 is calculated to be 3.16 parsecs. The calculations utilize the equations for gravitational force, flux, and luminosity, confirming that the radius ratio is 3.16, not 10, as the latter represents the ratio of surface areas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational force equations (g*=GM*/R*2)
  • Familiarity with flux and luminosity calculations (f*=L*/4πd*2)
  • Knowledge of logarithmic relationships in astronomy (m*1-m*2=-2.5log(f*1/f*2))
  • Basic principles of stellar physics, including effective temperature and surface gravity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the implications of surface gravity on stellar evolution
  • Learn about the relationship between luminosity and distance in astrophysics
  • Explore the concept of apparent magnitude and its calculation
  • Investigate the significance of radius ratios in stellar classification
USEFUL FOR

Astronomy students, astrophysicists, and anyone interested in stellar distance calculations and the underlying physics of stars.

Physics Dad
Messages
54
Reaction score
1
I have made an effort to answer this question, and would like to know if my thinking is correct. I would appreciate any feedback.

Thank you!


Homework Statement


Two stars in the sky have similar effective temperatures, masses and apparent brightness. However, star 1 has a surface gravity which is 10 times higher than star 2. If star 1 is 1pc away, what is the distance to star 2?

Homework Equations


i) g*=GM*/R*2
ii) f*=L*/4πd*2
iii) L*=4πR*2σT*eff4
iv) m*1-m*2=-2.5log(f*1/f*2)

The Attempt at a Solution


Based upon the question, I can assume that the mass (M*), the effective temperature (T*eff) and the apparent magnitude (m*) of both stars is the same.

First of all, I will start with the gravity which tells me that:

g*1=10g*2

so using equation i) I can say that:

GM/R*12=10GM/R*22

I can then rearrange to get a ratio of radii which will tell me that...

R*12/R*22=10-1

I can then calculate the ratio of fluxes by substituting equation iii) into equation ii),= and doing some cancelling to find that...

f*1/f*2=d*22(R*12/R*22)

I know that the value of R*12/R*22=10-1 so I can sub this value in

as I know that both apparent magnitudes are the same, I can say that m*1-m*2=0 and then sub in my ratio of fluxes to equation 4 to get...

0=-2.5log(d*22/10)

I can then solve this equation for d*2 and I get...

d*2=3.16pc

This seems feasible given that star two would have a radius 10 times bigger than star 1, but I would appreciate any help or advice anyone can offer.

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Physics Dad said:
d*2=3.16pc

This seems feasible given that star two would have a radius 10 times bigger than star 1, but I would appreciate any help or advice anyone can offer.

Thank you!
Answer is correct, but it imply radius ratio of 3.16, not 10. 10 is the surface areas ratio.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K