Calculating the Field of a Charge in a Coordinate System

  • Thread starter Thread starter zezima1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Field
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the electric field of a charge \( q \) in a coordinate system, particularly when the charge is positioned far along the x-axis. As the distance \( x \) increases significantly compared to the vertical distance \( d \), the vertical component of the electric field becomes negligible. The ratio of the vertical to horizontal components decreases linearly with distance, while the magnitudes of the components decrease as \( 1/r^3 \) and \( 1/r^2 \) respectively. Thus, in the far field limit, the vertical component can be disregarded for practical calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electric fields and forces
  • Familiarity with coordinate systems in physics
  • Knowledge of limits and ratios in calculus
  • Basic concepts of vector components in physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of electric field strength and its mathematical representation
  • Learn about the behavior of electric fields at large distances from point charges
  • Explore the implications of the inverse square law in electrostatics
  • Investigate the use of vector calculus in analyzing electric fields
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in understanding the behavior of electric fields in relation to point charges.

zezima1
Messages
119
Reaction score
0
Suppose you want to find the field of the charge q relative to the coorinate system on the picture. That won't be very hard to do and the field will in general have both a vertical and horizontal component. Now suppose we let the charge get very very far out on the x-axis, such that the horizontal distance to the origin is much much larger than the vertical distance from the origin to q.
My question is:
Will the vertical component of the force then be negligible compared to the horizontal? Because geometry does seem to suggest that, but on the other hand it is not really intuitive to me why. Evidently it is not like you are moving further away vertically than horizontally, it's rather the opposite.
 

Attachments

  • charge.png
    charge.png
    428 bytes · Views: 437
Physics news on Phys.org
zezima1 said:
Evidently it is not like you are moving further away vertically than horizontally, it's rather the opposite.

But, you are moving farther away from the charge. Hence, both components of the field get smaller, but the ratio of of vertical to horizontal component goes as d/x (which is the tangent of the angle) where d is the vertical offset. So, it's clear that the ratio drops linearly with distance, while the field magnitude drops as distance is squared.

For this reason I would say that the vertical component is negligible in the far field limit. In the limit as x goes to infinity, the vertical component of field goes to zero as 1/r^3 and the horizontal component goes to zero as 1/r^2. At some point along the way, you may want to neglect the vertical component.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K