- 2,802
- 605
I know my question is strange(and maybe stupid) but I'm really curious about it.I once tried to calculate the gradient of the magnitude of the gradient of a scalar field which for its x coordinate,I found:
[itex] \left[ \nabla \left( \left| \nabla \varphi \right| \right) \right]_{x} = <br /> \frac {\frac { \partial ^ {2} \varphi } {\partial x ^ {2} } } <br /> {\sqrt { 1+ (\frac{\frac {\partial \varphi} {\partial y} } {\frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial x} } )^{2} } }<br /> [/itex]
then I tried to write it in a simpler form and it just came into my mind that I can integrate it and write it as the derivative of a function so I made substitutions below and treated [itex]\frac {\partial \varphi} {\partial y}[/itex] as constant:
[itex]\frac{\frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial y} }{\frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial x} }=\tan{\theta}[/itex]
[itex] \frac{\partial ^{2} \varphi }{\partial x ^{2} }=- \frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial y} \csc ^{2}{\theta} d \theta[/itex]
so I arrived at:
[itex] <br /> \int \left[ \nabla \left( \left| \nabla \varphi \right| \right) \right]_{x} =<br /> \frac {\partial \varphi} {\partial y} \csc {\theta}<br /> [/itex]
I reverted and got the following:
[itex] <br /> \int \left[ \nabla \left( \left| \nabla \varphi \right| \right) \right]_{x} =<br /> \left| \nabla \varphi \right|<br /> [/itex]
Now comes my question:
When I check the things I've done,I just can tell bullsh*t.But the result tells that was really an inegration but I really don't understand how can that be an integration.
Sorry for such a mess and thanks in advance
[itex] \left[ \nabla \left( \left| \nabla \varphi \right| \right) \right]_{x} = <br /> \frac {\frac { \partial ^ {2} \varphi } {\partial x ^ {2} } } <br /> {\sqrt { 1+ (\frac{\frac {\partial \varphi} {\partial y} } {\frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial x} } )^{2} } }<br /> [/itex]
then I tried to write it in a simpler form and it just came into my mind that I can integrate it and write it as the derivative of a function so I made substitutions below and treated [itex]\frac {\partial \varphi} {\partial y}[/itex] as constant:
[itex]\frac{\frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial y} }{\frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial x} }=\tan{\theta}[/itex]
[itex] \frac{\partial ^{2} \varphi }{\partial x ^{2} }=- \frac {\partial \varphi } {\partial y} \csc ^{2}{\theta} d \theta[/itex]
so I arrived at:
[itex] <br /> \int \left[ \nabla \left( \left| \nabla \varphi \right| \right) \right]_{x} =<br /> \frac {\partial \varphi} {\partial y} \csc {\theta}<br /> [/itex]
I reverted and got the following:
[itex] <br /> \int \left[ \nabla \left( \left| \nabla \varphi \right| \right) \right]_{x} =<br /> \left| \nabla \varphi \right|<br /> [/itex]
Now comes my question:
When I check the things I've done,I just can tell bullsh*t.But the result tells that was really an inegration but I really don't understand how can that be an integration.
Sorry for such a mess and thanks in advance
Last edited: