Calculating the moment of inertia of a cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The moment of inertia for a 2/3 empty cylinder is calculated as 13/18 * M * r0^2, which is indeed greater than the moment of inertia of a full cylinder, represented by 1/2 * M * r0^2. This conclusion is supported by the distribution of mass in the cylinder, where the mass is located farther from the axis of rotation in the hollowed cylinder. The discussion emphasizes that the rotational inertia depends on both mass and its distribution, confirming the validity of the calculated moment of inertia.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of moment of inertia concepts
  • Familiarity with cylindrical geometry
  • Knowledge of mass distribution in rotational dynamics
  • Basic proficiency in calculus for integration (if needed)
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the moment of inertia for various shapes, including hollow cylinders and spheres
  • Study the derivation of moment of inertia formulas from first principles
  • Explore applications of moment of inertia in mechanical engineering
  • Learn about the effects of mass distribution on rotational dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics or engineering, particularly those studying mechanics, as well as professionals involved in rotational dynamics and structural analysis.

sapz
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hi there.

Im trying to find the moment of inertia for a 2/3 empty cylinder, could anyone see if I solved this correctly?
Someone told me it's wrong, but I don't know why exactly, so any thoughts would be much appreciated.

(I added the question and the attempt to solve it in a picture)The answer I got is 13/18 * M * r0^2.
Does it make sense that its more than the moment of inertia of a full cylinder? (1/2 * M r0^2)

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution

 

Attachments

  • cylinder.png
    cylinder.png
    27.8 KB · Views: 1,238
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Sapz,

I can find no error in your work, and have reproduced it for myself, so I'm pretty confident that your answer is correct. Furthermore, when you look at the moment of inertia of a thick-walled cylindrical tube around the z-axis here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_moments_of_inertia

and substitute in your values for r1 and r2 (inner and outer radii respectively) you also get this answer.

As for whether it makes sense when compared with a solid cylinder: I think it's not so easy to have an intuition for this. The whole point of this exercise is that the rotational inertia of a solid body depends not only on the mass, but also on how that mass is distributed around the axis of rotation. So, when you compare the two expressions, both in terms of "M", you have to keep in mind that "M" is distributed differently in the latter case: you have the same amount of mass, but all of it located farther from the axis. So I think it kind of does make sense that the inertia would be larger. Really though, you have to just do the math to be sure.

EDIT: If you just took the solid cylinder and hollowed 2/3 of it out, then M would be smaller than it was before. We didn't take this into account in our comparison of the two expressions for the moment of inertia above. We assumed that "M" had the same value in both expressions.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much cepheid!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K