Calculating the Period of SHM for a Suspended Cubical Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1bigman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cube Edge Shm
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the period of simple harmonic motion (SHM) for a cubical hollow box suspended from a frictionless hinge. The derived formula for the oscillation period is confirmed as T = 2π√(7√2a/9g). The solution involves using the total energy equation, E_tot = (1/2)Iω² + mg(√2/2a)cos(θ), and applying Taylor expansion to derive the angular acceleration equation, leading to the correct moment of inertia I = (2/3)ma². The initial miscalculation of the moment of inertia was identified as a key error in the problem-solving process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of simple harmonic motion (SHM)
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in physics
  • Ability to apply Taylor series expansions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the moment of inertia for various shapes
  • Learn about the applications of Taylor series in physics
  • Explore the principles of oscillations and their mathematical modeling
  • Investigate the effects of damping on SHM
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of oscillatory motion in mechanical systems.

1bigman
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We have a cubical hollow box, edge length ##a## suspended horizontally from a frictionless hinge along one of its edges. The box is displaced slightly and undergoes SHM. Show that the period of the oscillation is given by ## T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{7\sqrt{2}a}{9g}} ##

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



##E_{tot} = \frac{1}{2}I\omega^2 + mg\left(\frac{\sqrt{2}}{2a}\cos\theta\right) ##Then apply taylor expansion and differentiate to get: ## \ddot\theta = \frac{mga}{\sqrt{2}I} \theta ## and using ##I = \frac{2}{3}ma^2## gives ##T = 2\pi \sqrt{\frac{2\sqrt{2}a}{3g}}##

Help is much appreciated
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ah, turns out the moment of inertia was incorrect...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
6K
  • · Replies 70 ·
3
Replies
70
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K