Dark85
- 29
- 5
- Homework Statement
- I made an attempt to calculate the Planck Length
- Relevant Equations
- E=hf, E=mc^2, Formula for Schwarzschild radius
I was watching a video by Brian Cox on the Planck length. At 8 minutes and 31 seconds, he begins to talk about how one, in order to make an observation at size the Planck length, must use light of a tiny, tiny wavelength i.e. high energy photons(E=hf). He explains that so much energy goes into observing it that it forms a black hole. So I did some simple calculations on whatever equations I know to try to derive the formula for the Planck Length.
I assumed in order to make an observation at the Planck Length, one must use electromagnetic radiation of some wavelength. Assume my wavelength or##λ=2l##(I will explain my reasoning later in the question).
Now the wavelength of light is related to speed of light and frequency is ##λ = c/f##
But
$$
E = hf
$$
$$
f = \frac{E}{h}
$$
$$
λ = \frac{ch}{E}
$$
$$
Now I just took E=mc^2 and I replace λ by 2l.... Hence
$$
$$
2l = \frac{ch}{mc^2}
$$
$$
2l = \frac{h}{mc}
$$
$$
m = \frac{h}{2lc}
$$
Now Brian Cox stated that the energy to required to observe at such small scales will result in the formation of a black hole. So I assumed that the Schwarzschild radius of such a black hole would be equal to l. This is why I assumed the wavelength to be 2l. If l is really the smallest length that is physically possible, then assuming the size of the object is l would be incorrect as it's radius would become l/2, which is lesser than the smallest possible length. Also,
$$
l = \frac{2Gm}{c^2}
$$
$$
m = \frac{lc^2}{2G}
$$
Therefore,
$$
\frac{lc^2}{2G}=\frac{h}{2lc}
$$
$$
l^2 = \frac{Gh}{c^3}
$$
$$
l = \sqrt{\frac{Gh}{c^3}}
$$
But when I looked up the formula for the Planck Length, it showed
$$ \ell_p = \sqrt{\frac{G\hbar}{c^3}} $$
And as seen, it is the reduced Planck's constant in the formula and not just h.
Obviously, my math relies on very simple equation and it is very likely I might have missed somethings due to my lack of knowledge on the mathematics involved. However, I do have questions:
λ=
I assumed in order to make an observation at the Planck Length, one must use electromagnetic radiation of some wavelength. Assume my wavelength or##λ=2l##(I will explain my reasoning later in the question).
Now the wavelength of light is related to speed of light and frequency is ##λ = c/f##
But
$$
E = hf
$$
$$
f = \frac{E}{h}
$$
$$
λ = \frac{ch}{E}
$$
$$
Now I just took E=mc^2 and I replace λ by 2l.... Hence
$$
$$
2l = \frac{ch}{mc^2}
$$
$$
2l = \frac{h}{mc}
$$
$$
m = \frac{h}{2lc}
$$
Now Brian Cox stated that the energy to required to observe at such small scales will result in the formation of a black hole. So I assumed that the Schwarzschild radius of such a black hole would be equal to l. This is why I assumed the wavelength to be 2l. If l is really the smallest length that is physically possible, then assuming the size of the object is l would be incorrect as it's radius would become l/2, which is lesser than the smallest possible length. Also,
$$
l = \frac{2Gm}{c^2}
$$
$$
m = \frac{lc^2}{2G}
$$
Therefore,
$$
\frac{lc^2}{2G}=\frac{h}{2lc}
$$
$$
l^2 = \frac{Gh}{c^3}
$$
$$
l = \sqrt{\frac{Gh}{c^3}}
$$
But when I looked up the formula for the Planck Length, it showed
$$ \ell_p = \sqrt{\frac{G\hbar}{c^3}} $$
And as seen, it is the reduced Planck's constant in the formula and not just h.
Obviously, my math relies on very simple equation and it is very likely I might have missed somethings due to my lack of knowledge on the mathematics involved. However, I do have questions:
- Where does the factors 2π come in to the formula to ensure that it is the reduced Planck's constant and not just h in the formula?
- Are my assumptions mistaken anywhere (especially in taking ##E=mc^2##)?
- How exactly did Brian Cox come to the conclusion that the amount of energy used will result in the formation of the black hole?
λ=