MHB Calculating the Radius of a Circle Using Point Ratios

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Circle Radius
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Points A, B, C, D are on a circle with radius R. $$|AC| = |AB| = 500$$, while the ratio between $$|DC|$$, $$|DA|$$, $$|DB|$$ is 1, 5, 7. Find R.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Points A, B, C, D are on a circle with radius R. $$|AC| = |AB| = 500$$, while the ratio between $$|DC|$$, $$|DA|$$, $$|DB|$$ is 1, 5, 7. Find R.
circumcircle.png

Suppose that the distances DC, DA, DB are respectively 1, 5, 7, in some unknown units. Then AC and AB (which are known to be 500 in standard units) will be equal to $x$, say, in the unknown units.

The circle is the circumcircle of the triangles ABD and ACD. The circumradius of a triangle is always equal to one half of a side of the triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle. Thus in the triangle ABD, $\sin(\angle BAD) = \dfrac7{2R}$; and in the triangle ACD, $\sin(\angle ADC) = \dfrac x{2R}.$

The cosine rule in triangle ABD gives $\cos(\angle BAD) = \dfrac{x^2-24}{10x}$; and in triangle ACD it gives $\cos(\angle ADC) = \dfrac{26-x^2}{10}.$

Now use $\sin^2 + \cos^2 = 1$ for those two angles to get the equations $$\frac{49}{4R^2} + \frac{(x^2-24)^2}{100x^2} = 1, \qquad \frac{x^2}{4R^2} + \frac{(26-x^2)^2}{100} = 1.$$ Multiply out the fractions to get $$25*49x^2 + R^2(x^2-24)^2 = 100R^2x^2, \qquad 25x^2 + R^2(26-x^2)^2 = 100R^2.$$ Subtract the second equation from the first to get $-96R^2x^2 + 25*48x^2 = 0$, which leads to $R = 5/\sqrt2$ (in the unknown units). Substitute that value for $R$ into one of the two equations, which then reduces to $(x^2-25)^2 = 0$. Thus $x=5$. But we know that $x=500$ in standard units, so we need to multiply by 100, giving $\boxed{R= 250\sqrt2}$ as the solution.

Edit. That solution is wrong: see below.
 
Last edited:
Opalg said:
circumcircle.png

Suppose that the distances DC, DA, DB are respectively 1, 5, 7, in some unknown units. Then AC and AB (which are known to be 500 in standard units) will be equal to $x$, say, in the unknown units.

The circle is the circumcircle of the triangles ABD and ACD. The circumradius of a triangle is always equal to one half of a side of the triangle divided by the sine of the opposite angle. Thus in the triangle ABD, $\sin(\angle BAD) = \dfrac7{2R}$; and in the triangle ACD, $\sin(\angle ADC) = \dfrac x{2R}.$

The cosine rule in triangle ABD gives $\cos(\angle BAD) = \dfrac{x^2-24}{10x}$; and in triangle ACD it gives $\cos(\angle ADC) = \dfrac{26-x^2}{10}.$

Now use $\sin^2 + \cos^2 = 1$ for those two angles to get the equations $$\frac{49}{4R^2} + \frac{(x^2-24)^2}{100x^2} = 1, \qquad \frac{x^2}{4R^2} + \frac{(26-x^2)^2}{100} = 1.$$ Multiply out the fractions to get $$25*49x^2 + R^2(x^2-24)^2 = 100R^2x^2, \qquad 25x^2 + R^2(26-x^2)^2 = 100R^2.$$ Subtract the second equation from the first to get $-96R^2x^2 + 25*48x^2 = 0$, which leads to $R = 5/\sqrt2$ (in the unknown units). Substitute that value for $R$ into one of the two equations, which then reduces to $(x^2-25)^2 = 0$. Thus $x=5$. But we know that $x=500$ in standard units, so we need to multiply by 100, giving $\boxed{R= 250\sqrt2}$ as the solution.
Did anyone notice that that solution cannot possibly be correct? If $x=5$ (in the unknown units) then AD = AC, which is geometrically impossible, because AD is obviously shorter than AC. What I did wrong was that the calculation for $R$ is correct, giving $R=5/\sqrt2$ (in the unknown units), but when you substitute that value to get an equation for $x$, the equation does not reduce to $(x^2-25)^2 = 0$, but to $(x^2-18)(x^2-32) = 0$. Thus $x=3\sqrt2$ or $4\sqrt2$. But $3\sqrt2<5$, which would mean that AC < AD. That can't happen if the points A, B, C, D occur in that order on the circle. Therefore $x=4\sqrt2$ in unknown units, and the scaling factor to convert unknown units to standard units is $500/(4\sqrt2).$ So the correct solution is $R = \dfrac5{\sqrt2}\,*\,\dfrac{500}{4\sqrt2} = \boxed{312.5}.$
 
Opalg said:
Did anyone notice that that solution cannot possibly be correct? If $x=5$ (in the unknown units) then AD = AC, which is geometrically impossible, because AD is obviously shorter than AC. What I did wrong was that the calculation for $R$ is correct, giving $R=5/\sqrt2$ (in the unknown units), but when you substitute that value to get an equation for $x$, the equation does not reduce to $(x^2-25)^2 = 0$, but to $(x^2-18)(x^2-32) = 0$. Thus $x=3\sqrt2$ or $4\sqrt2$. But $3\sqrt2<5$, which would mean that AC < AD. That can't happen if the points A, B, C, D occur in that order on the circle. Therefore $x=4\sqrt2$ in unknown units, and the scaling factor to convert unknown units to standard units is $500/(4\sqrt2).$ So the correct solution is $R = \dfrac5{\sqrt2}\,*\,\dfrac{500}{4\sqrt2} = \boxed{312.5}.$

To be honest, I must confess to you that the value of R that I obtained was $$\frac{1250}{3}$$...

The time when I first saw your solution, I became very suspicious of my own result and I checked my working and found out I had made a premature assumption in my solution to which I didn't know how to make it right. I even thought to draw the circle out on a graph paper with the data that I obtained but I didn't do so at last. I told my boyfriend about this and he said I should ask for clarification if I was in doubt. But I thought to myself, 'Hey, Opalg is always right'...thus, it must be best to remain silent in this instance.:o

Having said this, here is my flaw solution and my mistake was by making false assumption that the center of the circle lies outside the cyclic quadrilateral ABDC and now, I even didn't sure if it was okay to label D in between B and C or should I make it lies between the points A and C...I must have thoroughly messed up the problem.

View attachment 764

First, I let the the distances of DC, DA, and DB be a, 5a and 7a respectively with a is a positive real value.

By applying Cosine Rule to the triangle ACD, we have:
$$500^2=a^2+(5a)^2-2(a)(5a) \cos (90^{\circ}-\alpha)$$

$$a^2(26-10 \sin \alpha) =500^2$$ (1)

We do the same to the triangle ABD and obtained:
$$500^2=(5a)^2+(7a)^2-2(5a)(7a) \cos (90^{\circ}-\alpha)$$

$$a^2(74-70 \sin \alpha) =500^2$$ (2)

Solving the equations 1 and 2 for $$\sin \alpha$$ yields

$$\sin \alpha = 0.8$$

Hence, $$a^2=\frac{125000}{9}$$ or $$a=\frac{250\sqrt{2}}{3}$$.

Last, by using the Cosine Rule again to the triangle OAB, we find that

$$R^2=R^2+500^2-2(R)(500)\cos \alpha$$

or

$$R=\frac{1250}{3}$$.
 

Attachments

  • FindingR_zpsf0faef05.jpg
    FindingR_zpsf0faef05.jpg
    18.9 KB · Views: 79
  • FindingR_zpsc739a452.jpg
    FindingR_zpsc739a452.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 85
anemone said:
I even didn't sure if it was okay to label D in between B and C or should I make it lies between the points A and C...I must have thoroughly messed up the problem.
You certainly have not messed up on the problem. I think that the question of whether the points come in the order ABCD or ABDC as you go round the circle is absolutely critical. If they come in the order ABDC then that would correspond (in my solution) to the case where $x^2 = 18$, in which case I agree with your answer $R=1250/3$. I assumed that the order would be ABCD, in which case $x^2 = 32$ and $R = 1250/4$.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Back
Top