Eccentric anomaly of ellipse-circle intersections

  • #1
Marko7
8
0
I want to calculate eccentric anomaly of all points of ellipse-circle intersection.
Ellipse is not rotated and its center is in origin.
Circle can be translated to (Cx, Cy) coordinates.
I am using python for calculations.

Only solution I found, is this:
https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/3419984/find-the-intersection-of-a-circle-and-an-ellipse
And I implemented it in my code. I avoided calculating polynomial roots manually by using numpy's solver.

ellipse_circle.py:
import numpy as np

def ellipse_circle(a, b, c_x, c_y, r):
    """Calculate eccentric anomalies of intersecting points
    on non-rotated ellipse in origin, and translated circle"""
    
    # quartic equation coefficients
    a_4 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x - r)**2
    a_3 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
    a_2 = 2 * (a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2 + 2*r**2) + b**2 * (c_x**2 - r**2))
    a_1 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
    a_0 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x + r)**2
    
    # quartic equation roots
    roots = np.polynomial.polynomial.polyroots([a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4])
    
    # take only non-complex roots
    real_roots = np.real(roots[np.isreal(roots)])
    
    return real_roots % (2*np.pi)

I tested it on some simple example:
>>> ellipse_circle(5, 2.17945, 4.5, 0, 1)
array([5.22599703, 1.05718828])

But those two roots are not eccentric anomalies of intersection points, as can be seen here (Point D is real intersection, and point A is calculated one):
image.png

So, what am I doing wrong, how can I calculate eccentric anomaly?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You are calculating values for the parameter [itex]z \in \mathbb{R}[/itex] in the parametrization of the circle [itex](x-x_c)^2 + (y-y_c)^2 = r^2[/itex] as
[tex]\begin{split}
x = x_c + r \frac{1 - z^2}{1 + z^2} \\
y = y_c + r \frac{2z}{1 + z^2}. \end{split}[/tex] [itex]z[/itex] is not an angle, so I do not think it is necessary or correct to return these modulo [itex]2\pi[/itex], as your program does (see line 20). Replace line 20 with
Python:
   return real_roots
and see if it does any better.

EDIT: Note that the point [itex](x_c - R, y_c)[/itex] is attained only in the limit [itex]|z| \to \infty[/itex]; this corresponds to the coefficient of [itex]z^4[/itex] vanishing. You can test this case by setting cx = -0.5, cy = 0, r = 0.5, a = b = 1.

I also now see from your diagram that you have misinterpreted the root 5.22 as being an angle in radians about the origin (5.22 rad ~ 299 deg); it is not. You need to use the above parametrization of the circle to recover the x and y coordinates. The eccentric anomaly can then be calculated as [tex]
\arccos\left(\frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - b^2/a^2}}\left(1 - \frac{\sqrt{(x-ae)^2 + y^2}}{a}\right)\right)[/tex] as shown here.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Marko7 and e_jane
  • #3
I had no idea that parameter is from circle.
I thought that parameter ##z## is same as parameter ##t## as used in normal parametric equations.

Here is working code if anyone in future needs it:
ellipse_circle.py:
import numpy as np
def ellipse_circle(a, b, c_x, c_y, r):
"""Calculate eccentric anomalies of intersecting points
    on non-rotated ellipse in origin, and translated circle"""
    # quartic equation coefficients
    a_0 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x + r)**2
    a_1 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
    a_2 = 2 * (a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2 + 2*r**2) + b**2 * (c_x**2 - r**2))
    a_3 = 4 * a**2 * r * c_y
    a_4 = a**2 * (c_y**2 - b**2) + b**2 * (c_x - r)**2
   
    # quartic equation roots
    roots = np.polynomial.polynomial.polyroots([a_0, a_1, a_2, a_3, a_4])
    # take only non-complex roots
    real_roots = np.real(roots[np.isreal(roots)])
   
    if any(real_roots):
        # calculate x and y coordinates
        x = c_x + r * (1-real_roots**2) / (1 + real_roots**2)
        y = c_y + r * 2 * real_roots / (1 + real_roots**2)
        ecc = np.sqrt(1-(b**2/a**2))
        # eccentric anomaly
        ea = np.arccos((1/np.sqrt(1-(b**2)/a**2)) * (1-(np.sqrt((x-a*ecc)**2 + y**2)/a)))
        ea = np.where(real_roots < 0, 2*np.pi-ea, ea)   # quadrant corrections
        return ea
    else:
        return np.array([])
Note: because of square roots in line 23, calculated angle is in range (0, ##\pi##), which is corrected in line 24.
Resulting eccentric anomaly is in range (0, ##2\pi##).

In my simulation it is very unlikely that this edge case with ##z^4## coefficient being zero will occur, so I just omitted it to save computation time.

Thanks. Helped a lot!
 
  • #4
Thinking again, it is simpler to obtain the anomaly from [itex](x,y)[/itex] as
Python:
np.arctan2(np.sign(y)*np.sqrt(a**2 - x**2),x)
since the auxiliary circle of the ellipse is [itex]x^2 + y^2 = a^2[/itex].

EDIT: Simpler still is
Code:
atan2((a/b)*y, x)
since [itex](x,y) \mapsto (x,(a/b)y)[/itex] maps the ellipse [itex](a\cos\theta, b\sin \theta)[/itex] to the circle [itex](a \cos \theta, a \sin \theta)[/itex].
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Marko7
  • #5
A further refinement is to parametrize the ellipse, rather than the circle, as [tex]\begin{split}
x &= a\frac{1 - z^2}{1 + z^2} \\
y &= b\frac{2z}{1 + z^2} \end{split}[/tex] and then the values of [itex]z[/itex] at the points of intersection are the roots of [itex]P(z) = \sum_{n=0}^4 a_nz^n = 0[/itex] where [tex]
\begin{split}
a_0 &= a^{2} - 2 a c_{x} + c_{x}^{2} + c_{y}^{2} - r^{2} \\
a_1 &= - 4 b c_{y} \\
a_2 &= - 2 a^{2} + 4 b^{2} + 2 c_{x}^{2} + 2 c_{y}^{2} - 2 r^{2} \\
a_3 &= - 4 b c_{y} \\
a_4 &= a^{2} + 2 a c_{x} + c_{x}^{2} + c_{y}^{2} - r^{2}
\end{split}[/tex] The anomalies are then obtained by
Python:
[
    np.atan2(2*z, 1.0 - z**2 ) for z in roots if np.isreal(z)
]
with the addition of [itex]\pi[/itex] if the degree of [itex]P[/itex] is less than 4.
 

What is the eccentric anomaly of ellipse-circle intersections?

The eccentric anomaly of ellipse-circle intersections refers to the angle between the center of the ellipse and the point where the ellipse intersects with a circle.

How is the eccentric anomaly calculated?

The eccentric anomaly can be calculated using trigonometry and the properties of ellipses and circles. It involves determining the angle formed by the center of the ellipse, the point of intersection, and the focus of the ellipse.

What is the significance of the eccentric anomaly in geometry?

The eccentric anomaly is important in geometry as it helps in determining the position of a point on an ellipse in relation to its center and focus. It is also used in celestial mechanics to describe the position of planets in their orbits.

Can the eccentric anomaly of ellipse-circle intersections be negative?

No, the eccentric anomaly is always a positive angle as it represents the position of a point on the ellipse in a counterclockwise direction from the positive x-axis.

Are there any real-world applications of understanding eccentric anomaly?

Yes, understanding eccentric anomaly is crucial in various fields such as astronomy, physics, and engineering. It helps in predicting the positions of celestial bodies, designing satellite orbits, and analyzing the motion of objects in elliptical paths.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
5K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
93
Views
6K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
52
Views
9K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • Math Proof Training and Practice
3
Replies
93
Views
10K
Back
Top