Calculating the residue of the following function

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Septim
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Residue
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the residue of the function \(\frac{1}{\sin(z\pi)z^2}\) at the point \(z=0\). Participants explore various methods for expanding the function in Laurent series, particularly focusing on how to identify the residue from the series expansion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to learn all possible methods for calculating the residue and mentions difficulty in expanding the function in Laurent series.
  • Another participant provides a corrected expansion of \(\sin(z\pi)\) and derives the residue as \(\frac{\pi}{6}\) from the series.
  • A participant asks for a systematic approach to calculating the terms in the series.
  • There is a concern raised about the potential error introduced by neglecting terms in the denominator, questioning whether this affects the coefficient of \(\frac{1}{z}\).
  • A response reassures that neglecting higher-order terms does not introduce significant error for the purpose of calculating the residue, as those terms do not influence the outcome.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the implications of neglecting terms in the series expansion. While some believe it does not affect the residue calculation, others remain uncertain about the validity of this approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the series expansion and its implications without reaching a consensus on the best method or the impact of neglecting terms. The discussion reflects varying levels of familiarity with series expansions and residue calculations.

Septim
Messages
166
Reaction score
6
Greetings everyone,

I have a question about calculating the residue of the following function at z=0 point. I am new to complex analysis so I would like to hear all the possible methods. I tried to expand the function I was dealing with in Laurent series and was unable to do so. How can I expand the following function in Laurent series about z=0 so that I can read of the residue at z=0?

[itex]\frac{1}{sin(z\pi)z^2}[/itex]

Many thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Septim said:
Greetings everyone,

I have a question about calculating the residue of the following function at z=0 point. I am new to complex analysis so I would like to hear all the possible methods. I tried to expand the function I was dealing with in Laurent series and was unable to do so. How can I expand the following function in Laurent series about z=0 so that I can read of the residue at z=0?

[itex]\frac{1}{sin(z\pi)z^2}[/itex]

Many thanks


I corrected your LaTeX:
[tex]\sin\pi z=\pi z-\frac{\pi^3z^3}{6}+...\Longrightarrow \frac{1}{\sin\pi z}=\frac{1}{\pi z\left(1-\left(\frac{\pi z}{\sqrt{6}}\right)^2+...\right)}=\frac{1}{\pi z}\left(1+\frac{\pi^2 z^2}{6}+\frac{\pi^4 z^4}{36}+...\right)\Longrightarrow \frac{1}{z^2\sin\pi z}=\frac{1}{\pi z^3}+\frac{\pi}{6z}+...\Longrightarrow\,\,res.= \frac{\pi}{6}[/tex]

DonAntonio
 


Thanks you but how can I calculate the terms in the series in a systematic way ?
 


Septim said:
Thanks you but how can I calculate the terms in the series in a systematic way ?



Well, just as I showed you...! Of course, in this case we're contented with very few summands of [itex]\,\,\sin\pi z\,\,[/itex] , as we're interested

only in the coefficient of [itex]\,\,\frac{1}{z}\,\,[/itex] , but in general you can go as much as you want.

Of course, another way would be to develop the MacClaurin (in fact, Laurent) series directly for [itex]\,\,\frac{1}{\sin\pi z}\,\,[/itex] , but who's time for all those calculations...?

DonAntonio
 


But does neglecting some terms in the denominator not introduce a big error ? It may also affect the coefficient of 1/z, how can you be sure that this is not the case ? I am unfamiliar with handling the series btw do not get me wrong.
 


Septim said:
But does neglecting some terms in the denominator not introduce a big error ? It may also affect the coefficient of 1/z, how can you be sure that this is not the case ? I am unfamiliar with handling the series btw do not get me wrong.



Check it carefully and you'll get convinced that there's no error at all in that (perhaps in some calculations is, though), since not writing

more summands of the Taylor series just "cuts" the summands with higher powers of z in the final outcome, and those don't interest us

to calculate the function's residue (in this case, at zero).

DonAntonio
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K