Understanding the Order of Poles in Complex Functions

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Baibhab Bose
Messages
34
Reaction score
3
When The denominator is checked, the poles seem to be at Sin(πz²)=0, Which means πz²=nπ ⇒z=√n for (n=0,±1,±2...)
but in the solution of this problem, it says that, for n=0 it would be simple pole since in the Laurent expansion of (z∕Sin(πz²)) about z=0 contains the highest negative power to be 1/z. But, in case of the other values of z=±√n,±i√n, it says the Laurent expansion of z∕Sin(πz²) about z=±√n,±i√n, contains the highest negative to be 1/(z±√n)² and 1/(z±i√n)² from which we can infer that for n≠0 it has second order poles at z=±√n,±i√n.
I couldn’t figure out how to check this, since I can't manage to expand this weird function in Laurent series about z=±√n,±i√n these singular points.
So, how do I proceed to do so?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
That answer doesn't seem correct to me. Let's look at a pole at ##\sqrt{n}##. Let ##\xi = z-\sqrt{n}## and look at ##sin(\pi z^2) = sin(\pi n + 2\pi \sqrt{n} \xi + \pi \xi^2)##. We can write that (using a trig identity): ##sin(\pi n + 2\pi \sqrt{n} \xi + \pi \xi^2) = sin(\pi n) cos(2\pi \sqrt{n} \xi + \pi \xi^2) + cos(\pi n) sin(2\pi \sqrt{n} \xi + \pi \xi^2) = 0 + (-1)^n sin(2\pi \sqrt{n} \xi + \pi \xi^2)## When ##\xi## is small, we can use ##sin(x) \approx x##, so this is approximately ##(-1)^n (2\pi \sqrt{n} \xi + ## higher order terms ##)##. So ##\frac{z}{sin(\pi z^2)} \approx \frac{\sqrt{n}}{(-1)^n 2 \pi \sqrt{n} \xi} = \frac{(-1)^n}{2\pi \xi}##. So I think it has a first order pole at ##z = \sqrt{n}##
 
Thank you so much @stevendaryl !
But again my confusion is, here we see that this function, at the singular point, which you have evaluated, doesn't blow up at all, rather it boils down to a constant value. So in that case at z=√n the function remains analytic, and z=√n is not a pole at all, isn't it?
Again if I'm not wrong, that last constant term (−1)^n/2πξ is not a constant, since the ξ is present there in the denominator, which actually approaches 0, thereby blowing up the function. Thus we can conclude that its a simple pole at z=rootn. Right?
 
Baibhab Bose said:
Thank you so much @stevendaryl !
But again my confusion is, here we see that this function, at the singular point, which you have evaluated, doesn't blow up at all, rather it boils down to a constant value.

No, assuming my approximation is accurate, near ##z=\sqrt{n}##, the function ##\frac{z}{sin(\pi z^2)} \approx \frac{1}{2\pi \xi} = \frac{1}{2\pi (z-\sqrt{n})}##. So it blows up when ##z \rightarrow \sqrt{n}##

Again if I'm not wrong, that last constant term (−1)^n/2πξ is not a constant, since the ξ is present there in the denominator, which actually approaches 0, thereby blowing up the function. Thus we can conclude that its a simple pole at z=rootn. Right?

I think so. Saying that it has an order 2 pole seems wrong to me.
 
Yes, now its clear! Thank you, it was really helpful sir! :D