Calculating the Value of (1+i)^56

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Petrus
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Value
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the value of \((1+i)^{56}\) using polar form and de Moivre's theorem. Participants explore various approaches to express the complex number in polar coordinates and analyze the summation of terms resulting from this expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose expressing \((1+i)^{56}\) as \((\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}})^{56}\) and converting it to polar form.
  • There are discussions regarding the application of de Moivre's theorem to find the terms of the summation.
  • One participant suggests plotting partial sums in the complex plane to gain insight into the behavior of the terms.
  • Another participant introduces the formula for the sum of a geometric series, indicating its relevance to the problem.
  • Some participants express confusion over the correct application of trigonometric identities and the placement of variables in their expressions.
  • There are corrections regarding the formulation of terms in the summation, with some participants questioning the accuracy of their expressions.
  • One participant emphasizes the periodic nature of the terms, noting that they repeat in blocks of eight.
  • Another participant expresses a lack of understanding regarding the geometric series formula and its derivation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the correct approach to the problem, with multiple competing views and expressions presented throughout the discussion. Confusion and corrections indicate that the topic remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying levels of understanding among participants regarding complex numbers, polar coordinates, and the geometric series formula. Some assumptions about prior knowledge may not be shared by all participants.

Who May Find This Useful

Readers interested in complex analysis, particularly in the context of polar coordinates and summation techniques, may find this discussion relevant.

Petrus
Messages
702
Reaction score
0
Hello MHB,
2qwhjsl.png

I got no clue about that, well I start wounder but I don't think so but is that same as
$$(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}})^{56}$$
then I could go to polar form and get
$$r=1$$ that means $$cos\theta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \ sin\theta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$$ that means we got $$(e^{i\frac{\pi}{4}})^{56} <=>e^{i14\pi} $$ so we got $$1^{56}(1+0i) =1$$
Is this correct?

Regards,
$$|\rangle$$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: polar form

You have correctly found the last term of the summation.

I would try writing the summation in trigonometric form using de Moivre's theorem...
 
Re: polar form

Petrus said:
Hello MHB,
2qwhjsl.png

I got no clue about that, well I start wounder but I don't think so but is that same as
$$(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}+\frac{i}{\sqrt{2}})^{56}$$
then I could go to polar form and get
$$r=1$$ that means $$cos\theta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}} \ sin\theta=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}$$ that means we got $$(e^{i\frac{\pi}{4}})^{56} <=>e^{i14\pi} $$ so we got $$1^{56}(1+0i) =1$$
Is this correct?

Regards,
$$|\rangle$$

Well... you've only got the last term.
Which term do you get for k=0? And k=1? k=2? k=3?
 
Re: polar form

MarkFL said:
You have correctly found the last term of the summation.

I would try writing the summation in trigonometric form using de Moivre's theorem...
Is this correct?
$$\cos(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+\frac{k2\pi}{56})+ \sin(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+i \frac{k2\pi}{56})$$ k=0,1,2,3..,56

Regards
$$|\rangle$$
 
Re: polar form

Plotting the first few partial sums in the complex plane may provide some insight..

(it draws regular octagons.. why? what happens at the last partial sum?)
 
Last edited:
Re: polar form

You can use

$$\sum^{n}_{k=0} e^{ix k}= \frac{1-e^{(n+1)ix}}{1-e^{ix}}$$
 
Re: polar form

Petrus said:
Is this correct?
$$\cos(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+\frac{k2\pi}{56})+ \sin(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+i \frac{k2\pi}{56})$$ k=0,1,2,3..,56

Regards
$$|\rangle$$

Nope. It's not. Both the $i$ and the $k$ are misplaced.
 
Re: polar form

ZaidAlyafey said:
You can use

$$\sum^{n}_{k=0} e^{ix k}= \frac{1-e^{(n+1)ix}}{1-e^{ix}}$$

Your number is really $$\alpha = \exp \left( \frac{i\pi }{4} \right)$$.

Show that $$\sum\limits_{k = 0}^7 {{\alpha ^k}} = 0$$

This repeats in blocks of eight.

So only $$\alpha^0$$ is left.
 
Last edited:
Re: polar form

I like Serena said:
Nope. It's not. Both the $i$ and the $k$ are misplaced.
Hm... I get $$\cos(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+\frac{k2\pi}{56})+i \sin(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+ \frac{ik2\pi}{56})$$ k=0,1,2,3..,56
What I am doing wrong?

Regards,
$$|\rangle$$
 
  • #10
Re: polar form

Petrus said:
Hm... I get $$\cos(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+\frac{k2\pi}{56})+i \sin(\frac{\frac{\pi}{4}}{56}+ \frac{ik2\pi}{56})$$ k=0,1,2,3..,56
What I am doing wrong?

Regards,
$$|\rangle$$

For each term you've got $$(e^{i\frac \pi 4})^k = e^{i \frac {k\pi} 4} = \cos \frac {k\pi} 4 + i \sin \frac {k\pi} 4$$
Somehow it just doesn't look the same.
 
  • #11
Re: polar form

Plato said:
Your number is really $$\alpha = \exp \left( \frac{i\pi }{4} \right)$$.

Show that $$\sum\limits_{k = 1}^7 {{\alpha ^k}} = 0$$

This repeats in blocks of seven.

So only $$\alpha^0$$ is left.

but you should start from k=0 , to get 0 .
 
  • #12
Re: polar form

Hello MHB,
Thanks for all responed but I totally got confused. I need to read over my book and see if I missed something, I totally got confused and don't understand...$$|\rangle$$
 
  • #13
Re: polar form

Petrus said:
Hello MHB,
Thanks for all responed but I totally got confused. I need to read over my book and see if I missed something, I totally got confused and don't understand...$$|\pi\rangle$$

Okay...
What is it you got confused over? And that you don't understand...?
 
  • #14
Re: polar form

I like Serena said:
Okay...
What is it you got confused over? And that you don't understand...?
I just got diffrent tips. I just lost myself, in facit it says use the trick zaid said. $$\sum^{n}_{k=0} e^{ix k}= \frac{1-e^{(n+1)ix}}{1-e^{ix}}$$[/QUOTE]
but I can't find that in my book, I don't understand where it comes from

Regards,
$$|\rangle$$
 
  • #15
Re: polar form

It's just the geometric series partial sum formula, with $e^{ix}$ as a base.

$$\sum_{k=0}^n a^k = \frac{1 - a^{n+1}}{1 - a}$$

Do you know this formula?
 
  • #16
Re: polar form

Bacterius said:
It's just the geometric series partial sum formula, with $e^{ix}$ as a base.

$$\sum_{k=0}^n a^k = \frac{1 - a^{n+1}}{1 - a}$$

Do you know this formula?
Nop, I have not seen it. is this something famous formula?

Regards,
$$|\rangle$$
 
  • #17
Re: polar form

Well it's pretty useful. You can derive it easily:

$$\sum_{k = 0}^n a^k = a^0 + a^1 + a^2 + \cdots + a^n = S$$

$$aS = a^1 + a^2 + a^3 + \cdots + a^{n + 1} = S + a^{n + 1} - a^0$$

$$(a - 1)S = a^{n + 1} - 1$$

$$S = \frac{a^{n + 1} - 1}{a - 1} = \frac{1 - a^{n + 1}}{1 - a}$$

Now let $a = e^{ix}$ and you have the formula you were confused about. It still works for complex numbers :)

The sum to infinity is similar except in that case there is no $a^{n + 1}$ obviously so you just get $\frac{1}{1 - a}$ :p (only if $|a| < 1$ of course otherwise the sum does not converge)
 
Last edited:
  • #18
Re: polar form

Hello,
Thanks evryone! Now I understand!

Regards,
$$|\rangle$$
 
  • #19
Re: polar form

Hey Petrus,

As others hinted at, this is what I wanted you to write:

$$S=\sum_{k=1}^{56}\left(\cos\left(\frac{k\pi}{4} \right)+i\sin\left(\frac{k\pi}{4} \right) \right)$$

and then look at:

$$S=7\sum_{k=1}^{8}\left(\cos\left(\frac{k\pi}{4} \right)+i\sin\left(\frac{k\pi}{4} \right) \right)=7\cdot0=0$$
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K