• Support PF! Buy your school textbooks, materials and every day products via PF Here!

Calculating the Work Required to Climb Stairs

  • Thread starter Villager27
  • Start date
10
1
1. Homework Statement
A 60.78kg student climbs 4.08m of stairs in 3.85s. Calculate the work required to climb the stairs.

m= 60.78kg, Δdy=4.08m, Δt=3.85s

2. Homework Equations
W=FΔd OR EK=1/2mv2

3. The Attempt at a Solution
My friends and I are conflicted in how to solve this problem. I believe that because it is the work required, that I must use the first equation, and find the force of gravity (the student only needs to overcome gravity to climb the stairs):

W=FΔd
W=(m)(g)(Δd)
W=(60.78)(9.8)(4.08)
W=2430.228J
W=2.43x103J

My friends, on the other hand, believe that we should use the velocity to find the kinetic energy to climb the staircase:

EK=1/2mv
EK=1/2(60.78)(Δdy/Δt)
EK=1/2(60.78)(4.08/3.85)
EK=1/2(60.78)(1.06)
EK=32.2134J
EK=32.2J

Which one of us are correct? If neither of us are, could you please provide the solution to this problem, or an explanation on how to get there? Thanks in advance!
 
Last edited:

PeroK

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
9,979
3,756
1. Homework Statement
A 60.78kg student climbs 4.08m of stairs in 3.85s. Calculate the work required to climb the stairs.

m= 60.78kg, Δdy=4.08m, Δt=3.85s

2. Homework Equations
W=FΔd OR EK=1/2mv2

3. The Attempt at a Solution
My friends and I are conflicted in how to solve this problem. I believe that because it is the work required, that I must use the first equation, and find the force of gravity (the student only needs to overcome gravity to climb the stairs):

W=FΔd
W=(m)(g)(Δd)
W=(60.78)(9.8)(4.08)
W=2430.228J
W=2.43x103J

My friends, on the other hand, believe that we should use the velocity to find the kinetic energy to climb the staircase:

EK=1/2mv
EK=1/2(60.78)(Δdy/Δt)
EK=1/2(60.78)(4.08/3.85)
EK=1/2(60.78)(1.06)
EK=32.2134J
EK=32J

Which one of us are correct? If neither of us are, could you please provide the solution to this problem, or an explanation on how to get there? Thanks in advance!
It depends whether he still has KE at the top of the stairs. If he has no KE (and has used gravity to slow himself down), then your solution is correct. And, I suspect, this is the answer this is sought.

Alternatively, if he was already moving at a speed ##v## when he reached the stairs and maintained that speed as he climbed and continued at that speed at the top of the stairs, then, again, your answer is correct.

If, however, he has more or less KE at the top of the stairs than he did at the bottom, then that's a different problem. Note that in this case, the speed wouldn't be the vertical speed, but his overall speed, including vertical and horizontal components. This is not, I believe, the intended problem.
 
686
172
Using the second method - i.e., if the amount of energy was only dependent on speed - it would require the same amount of energy to climb 1 stair as it would to climb the stairs of the empire state building.

Edit: P.S. Welcome to Physics Forums.
 
10
1
Thanks for the assistance!
 
10
1
A later part of the question states: Calculate the power the student generated climbing the stairs. Is the following solution correct?

EM=EK+EG
EM=1/2mv2+EG
EM=(1/2)(60.78)(Δd/Δt)2+2430.228
EM=(1/2)(60.78)(4.08/3.85)2+2430.228
EM=(1/2)(60.78)(1.06)2+2430.228
EM=(1/2)(60.78)(1.1236)
EM=34.146+2430.228
EM=2464.644J
EM=2460J

P=EM/Δt
P=2464.644/3.85
P=640.17W
P=6.40x102W

Thanks again in advance!
 

haruspex

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
31,714
4,688
It depends whether he still has KE at the top of the stairs
Yes and no.
If no remnant KE is required then yes, the first method is right and the second wrong. But if we are supposed to assume constant velocity then neither is right; in fact, we do not have enough information. These are stairs, not a ladder, so the velocity will not be purely vertical.
Calculate the power the student generated climbing the stairs. Is the following solution correct?
I would interpret this as meaning average power, so you can use the work done calculated previously and just divide that by time.
If you interpret this as implying the power is constant then the question gets a lot more involved. It would not correspond to constant velocity, nor to constant acceleration, but something between the two.
 
10
1
so you can use the work done calculated previously and just divide that by time.
The first question is asking about the work required, not the actual work performed by the student. I found the mechanical energy so it also includes the additional energy (via kinetic energy) that they've inputted. If I simply divided the work found in the first question by time, I would find the power required, not the actual power put in.
 

haruspex

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
31,714
4,688
I would find the power required, not the actual power put in.
As I explained, you have no way to determine the average power put in. You have to make other assumptions. If you assume constant speed then you also need to assume a value for the slope.
The first part asks for the work required, implying the minimum value. As PeroK noted, the student can go at whatever speed until close enough to the top that KE alone will take her the rest of the way, arriving with no wasted KE. In the extreme case, the student accelerates at a superhuman rate for a fraction of a second, then makes it the rest of the way expending no further effort. Since that would get the time under one second, it is an allowed solution.
When it asks for the power generated, it is clearly referring to the same context, namely getting to the top of the stairs in the stated time using the least work. To use a larger value for the work than calculated in the first part is simply inconsistent.
 

PeroK

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
9,979
3,756
The first question is asking about the work required, not the actual work performed by the student. I found the mechanical energy so it also includes the additional energy (via kinetic energy) that they've inputted. If I simply divided the work found in the first question by time, I would find the power required, not the actual power put in.
You asked whether method a) or b) was correct. Three of us explained that method a) was correct, you thanked us for the explanation and then went on to use method b). :frown:
 
10
1
went on to use method b)
I used method a) and b) because I thought it was the correct way to figure out the power that the student generated. As by the explanations above, could someone explain why it's only the gravitational potential energy divided by time?
When it asks for the power generated, it is clearly referring to the same context, namely getting to the top of the stairs in the stated time using the least work. To use a larger value for the work than calculated in the first part is simply inconsistent.
Or is this the explanation why?
 

haruspex

Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2018 Award
31,714
4,688
could someone explain why it's only the gravitational potential energy divided by time?
Because the student can arrange to reach the top of the stairs in the stated time with no residual KE, so all the work has gone into raising the PE.
 

NascentOxygen

Mentor
9,215
1,056
My friends, on the other hand, believe that we should use the velocity to find the kinetic energy to climb the staircase:

EK=1/2mv
EK=1/2(60.78)(Δdy/Δt)
Is this a correct expression for kinetic energy?
 
10
1
I made a mistake in that expression, but I forgot to fix it. I'll fix it later. @NascentOxygen
 
686
172
I found the mechanical energy so it also includes the additional energy (via kinetic energy) that they've inputted.
I understand your argument for adding in the kinetic energy, as it is definitely energy that the student had to generate at some point. However, I suspect you are making the problem more difficult than it was intended. If I was grading your work, I probably would give you full credit if you worked it that way correctly. But someone else who took a more hard line might argue, "How many people have you seen who stop at the bottom of the stairs before they ascend the stairs? That kinetic energy had nothing to do with work the student generated to climb the stairs."
 

NascentOxygen

Mentor
9,215
1,056
A 60.78kg student climbs 4.08m of stairs in 3.85s.
That would have to involve 4.08m measured vertically. I think that's the convention for stairs, hills, etc., and often reinforced by "climb", "rise", "ascend", or similar.
 

Want to reply to this thread?

"Calculating the Work Required to Climb Stairs" You must log in or register to reply here.

Related Threads for: Calculating the Work Required to Climb Stairs

  • Posted
Replies
12
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • Posted
Replies
6
Views
12K
  • Posted
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
27K
Replies
28
Views
1K

Physics Forums Values

We Value Quality
• Topics based on mainstream science
• Proper English grammar and spelling
We Value Civility
• Positive and compassionate attitudes
• Patience while debating
We Value Productivity
• Disciplined to remain on-topic
• Recognition of own weaknesses
• Solo and co-op problem solving
Top