Calculating Torque on a Dam Due to Water

  • Thread starter Thread starter bigplanet401
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Torque Water
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the torque on a dam due to water pressure, specifically addressing the misconception that torque can be simply calculated using the average force and average depth. The correct approach involves dividing the water into N slabs, where the force on each slab varies linearly with depth. The final torque expression derived is N = (D^3 ρ W g) / 6, where D is the water depth, ρ is the water density, W is the dam width, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. This result highlights the importance of considering the distribution of forces across the depth of the water rather than relying on average values.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of fluid mechanics, particularly hydrostatic pressure.
  • Familiarity with torque calculations and moment arms.
  • Knowledge of calculus, specifically summation and limits.
  • Basic principles of static equilibrium in physics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study hydrostatic pressure calculations in fluid mechanics.
  • Learn about the derivation of torque in varying force scenarios.
  • Explore the concept of moment arms in physics and engineering applications.
  • Investigate the implications of fluid dynamics on structural engineering, particularly in dam design.
USEFUL FOR

Students in physics and engineering, particularly those studying fluid mechanics and structural analysis, as well as professionals involved in dam design and water resource management.

bigplanet401
Messages
101
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A body of water of depth D sits behind a vertical dam. The water and dam are in static equilibrium. Calculate the torque on the dam due to the water about an axis at ground level (that is, a depth D below the surface of the water).

Homework Equations


N (torque) = r x F

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm guessing that the force on the dam due to the water acts at a point D/2 above ground since the vertical coordinate of the center of mass of the water would be this high. Then the torque is just DF/2.

But consider the following argument. The force on the dam varies linearly with depth. Wouldn't this mean that I would get the same answer if I divided the water into N "slabs" (like a stack of books) and calculated the contribution to the torque from each slab, each with its own moment arm?

I tried the following: divide the water into N "slabs" of thickness D/N. The height of the ith slab is Di/N. The force on the dam from this slab is F(1 - i/N), where the maximum force (at the bottom of the dam) is F. Then the total torque is

<br /> \sum_{i=1}^N \; \frac{FDi}{N} \left( 1 - \frac{i}{N} \right)<br />

But if I try to work out the sum and take the limit as N -> infinity, the sum becomes infinite. Is it just my math, or is this not the right argument? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you suggest, your answer of DF/2 is not correct.

For your summation approach, note that the force on a slab is due to fluid pressure acting on the slab. How does the force on a slab depend on the area of the slab? What happens to the areas of the slabs as N increases? You need to take that into account.
 
TSny said:
As you suggest, your answer of DF/2 is not correct.

For your summation approach, note that the force on a slab is due to fluid pressure acting on the slab. How does the force on a slab depend on the area of the slab? What happens to the areas of the slabs as N increases? You need to take that into account.

Thanks for the hints. After thinking about it more, I came up with the following sum for the torque:

<br /> N = \sum_{i=1}^N \; \left(D - \frac{Di}{N} \right) \rho W g \frac{D}{N} \frac{Di}{N}<br />

where D is the depth of the water, N is the number of slabs (each of thickness D/N), W is the width of the dam, rho is the density of water, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. I did the sum, took the large-N limit, and got

<br /> N = \frac{D^3 \rho W g}{6}<br />

Again, my math could be wrong, but if this result is correct, it really challenges my intuition. Why isn't the torque on the dam just the average force due to water pressure times the "middle depth", D/2? The force varies linearly with depth, so why isn't the total torque just (average moment arm) x (average force) = FD/2?
 
bigplanet401 said:
N = \sum_{i=1}^N \; \left(D - \frac{Di}{N} \right) \rho W g \frac{D}{N} \frac{Di}{N}
[/tex]

where D is the depth of the water, N is the number of slabs (each of thickness D/N), W is the width of the dam, rho is the density of water, and g is the acceleration due to gravity. I did the sum, took the large-N limit, and got

<br /> N = \frac{D^3 \rho W g}{6}<br />

That looks like the correct result, but it's a little confusing to use N for both the torque and the number of slabs.

Again, my math could be wrong, but if this result is correct, it really challenges my intuition. Why isn't the torque on the dam just the average force due to water pressure times the "middle depth", D/2? The force varies linearly with depth, so why isn't the total torque just (average moment arm) x (average force) = FD/2?

Let Fi be the force on the ith slab and Li the moment arm of the ith slab. Let N be the number of slabs and assume N is an even number. Then, for large N the net torque is (approximately)

Torque = F1L1 + ⋅⋅⋅ + FN/2LN/2 +⋅⋅⋅ + FNLN .

Note that the one term FN/2LN/2 is essentially the average force times the average lever arm. So, it's clear that the total sum is greater than the average force times the average lever arm.

FN/2LN/2 is just the torque on the one slab in the middle.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
16K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
644