MHB Calculating Total Area Under a Trapezoidal Curve for Water Tank Fill Time

sophbell
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
image.jpg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
sophbell said:
The area represented under the curve is a triangle (up to t = 2 hours) plus a rectangle. How do you find the sum of that area?

-Dan
 
Draw a horizontal line at "100" all the way across. Draw a vertical line at "2" all the way up and down. That divides the area into a right triangle with one leg of length 2 and the other of length 200, a rectangle with width 2 and height 100, and another rectangle with height 300 and unknown width. What is the area of the triangle and the first rectangle?

If that is less than 1000, subtract if from 1000. How wide must the second rectangle be so that its area is that difference?
 
topsquark said:
The area represented under the curve is a triangle (up to t = 2 hours) plus a rectangle. How do you find the sum of that area?

-Dan

Surely it's a trapezium and a rectangle...
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top