Calculating Upward Support Force on a Rigid Beam

  • Thread starter Thread starter guru
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Beam Force
Click For Summary
A 3.0-meter rigid beam with a mass of 100 kg is supported at both ends, with an 80 kg student positioned 2.0 meters from one support. The weight of the student is calculated to be 784N, and the weight of the beam is 980N. The upward force exerted by support 1 was initially miscalculated, as the moments caused by both the student and the beam were not properly considered. The correct calculation involves using the equation (2x784) + (1.5x980) = 3xF, leading to the upward force at support 1 being determined as 751.33N after accounting for the total downward forces. Acknowledgment of the beam's weight was crucial for arriving at the accurate force exerted by the supports.
guru
Messages
38
Reaction score
0
A 3.0-m-long rigid beam with a mass of 100 kg is supported at each end. A
80 kg student stands 2.0 m from support 1. How much upward force does support 1 exert on the beam?

I first found the weight of the student to be 784N.
so 784N*2cm =F*3cm
F= 522.67N
is this right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, its not. I think you forgot to take the moment caused by the weight of the beam.
I think this is how it should be done:
(2x784)+(1.5x980) = 3xF
This gives us the value of F(Force on the other support)=1012.67N
Substracting this value from the total downward force(784N+980N) we get the upward force exerted by the support1 be 751.33N
 
DeathKnight said:
No, its not. I think you forgot to take the moment caused by the weight of the beam.
I think this is how it should be done:
(2x784)+(1.5x980) = 3xF
This gives us the value of F(Force on the other support)=1012.67N
Substracting this value from the total downward force(784N+980N) we get the upward force exerted by the support1 be 751.33N


Yes, I forgot to consider the weight of the beam.
Thanks.
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
12K
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K