Calculating Velocity from Conservation of Momentum: A Science Tutorial

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndrewMorris
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving the calculation of velocity using the principle of conservation of momentum. Participants are examining the setup and calculations related to a specific scenario, likely involving two colliding objects with given masses and velocities.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial calculation approach and question the accuracy of the computed value. There is a suggestion to verify specific numerical values used in the calculations and to consider symbolic calculations to minimize errors.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's calculations. Some guidance has been offered regarding potential errors and alternative calculation methods, indicating a productive exchange of ideas.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of multiple choice responses, suggesting constraints on the expected answer. Participants are reflecting on common mistakes in calculations, indicating a shared understanding of the challenges faced in such problems.

AndrewMorris
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
My daughter was asked this question:
A person of mass 60 kg running at 8 m/s reaches a wagon of mass 80 kg going at 2 m/s and jumps onto it. Calculate the velocity of the wagon immediately after the person jumps on.
Relevant Equations
total momentum before impact = total momentum after impact
Using conservation of momentum I would say (60 x 8) + (80 x 2) = (60 + 80) v
so v = 400/140 = 2.86 m/s.
However, this is not one of the multiple choice responses. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Setup looks right. But check the number 400.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
Apart from that, consider using symbolic calculations and only insert your numbers at the end. It often avoids this kind of mistakes. Or at least use units throughout.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
 
AndrewMorris said:
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
It was just a careless error. Happens to us all :oldsmile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
803
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
910