Calculating Velocity from Conservation of Momentum: A Science Tutorial

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndrewMorris
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating velocity using the conservation of momentum formula. The correct calculation is derived from the equation (60 x 8) + (80 x 2) = (60 + 80) v, leading to a velocity of v = 2.86 m/s. The participant identified a careless error in their calculation, specifically with the number 400. The advice given includes using symbolic calculations and maintaining consistent units throughout the process to avoid similar mistakes in the future.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of momentum principles
  • Basic algebra skills for solving equations
  • Familiarity with units of measurement in physics
  • Experience with symbolic calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of conservation of momentum in detail
  • Practice solving physics problems using symbolic calculations
  • Review common mistakes in algebraic calculations
  • Learn about dimensional analysis to ensure unit consistency
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching momentum concepts, and anyone looking to improve their problem-solving skills in mechanics.

AndrewMorris
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
My daughter was asked this question:
A person of mass 60 kg running at 8 m/s reaches a wagon of mass 80 kg going at 2 m/s and jumps onto it. Calculate the velocity of the wagon immediately after the person jumps on.
Relevant Equations
total momentum before impact = total momentum after impact
Using conservation of momentum I would say (60 x 8) + (80 x 2) = (60 + 80) v
so v = 400/140 = 2.86 m/s.
However, this is not one of the multiple choice responses. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Setup looks right. But check the number 400.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
Apart from that, consider using symbolic calculations and only insert your numbers at the end. It often avoids this kind of mistakes. Or at least use units throughout.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: TSny
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
 
AndrewMorris said:
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
It was just a careless error. Happens to us all :oldsmile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
787
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
969
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
886