Calculating Velocity from Conservation of Momentum: A Science Tutorial

  • Thread starter Thread starter AndrewMorris
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on using conservation of momentum to calculate velocity, with a specific example yielding a velocity of 2.86 m/s. The original calculation appears correct, but a participant suggests double-checking the number 400 for potential errors. They recommend using symbolic calculations and maintaining consistent units to avoid mistakes. Acknowledgment of common errors in math is shared, emphasizing that such mistakes can happen to anyone. The conversation highlights the importance of careful calculation and verification in physics problems.
AndrewMorris
Messages
4
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
My daughter was asked this question:
A person of mass 60 kg running at 8 m/s reaches a wagon of mass 80 kg going at 2 m/s and jumps onto it. Calculate the velocity of the wagon immediately after the person jumps on.
Relevant Equations
total momentum before impact = total momentum after impact
Using conservation of momentum I would say (60 x 8) + (80 x 2) = (60 + 80) v
so v = 400/140 = 2.86 m/s.
However, this is not one of the multiple choice responses. What am I doing wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Setup looks right. But check the number 400.
 
Apart from that, consider using symbolic calculations and only insert your numbers at the end. It often avoids this kind of mistakes. Or at least use units throughout.
 
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
 
AndrewMorris said:
oh man, I used to be good at maths, honest. Thanks :-)
It was just a careless error. Happens to us all :oldsmile:
 
Thread 'Correct statement about size of wire to produce larger extension'
The answer is (B) but I don't really understand why. Based on formula of Young Modulus: $$x=\frac{FL}{AE}$$ The second wire made of the same material so it means they have same Young Modulus. Larger extension means larger value of ##x## so to get larger value of ##x## we can increase ##F## and ##L## and decrease ##A## I am not sure whether there is change in ##F## for first and second wire so I will just assume ##F## does not change. It leaves (B) and (C) as possible options so why is (C)...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
750
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
817
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
845