Calculating Vertical Jump Heights

Click For Summary
Very few humans can achieve a vertical jump exceeding 2 feet (0.6 m). The time spent moving upward in a 2-foot jump is calculated as approximately 0.35 seconds, leading to a total hang time of 0.70 seconds. For Michael Jordan's jump with a hang time of 1 second, the vertical height is calculated to be 4.9 meters. However, a correction is noted that the hang time should be divided by 2 for accurate calculations in part b. Overall, the calculations for part a are deemed correct, while part b requires adjustment.
needhelp83
Messages
193
Reaction score
0
Surprisingly, very few humans can jump more than 2 feet (0.6 m) straight up. Solve for the time one spends moving upward in a 2-foot vertical jump. Then double it for the "hang time" - the time one's feet are off the ground.
b) Calculate the vertical height of Michael Jordan's jump when he attains a hang time of a full 1 s.

a)
t=sqrt(2d/g) =sqrt(2(0.6 m))/9.8 =0.35 s

Hangtime=0.35 s x 2= 0.70 s

b)
d=(1/2)gt2=(1/2)(9.8 m/s2)(1.0 s)2= 4.9 m


Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
needhelp83 said:
Surprisingly, very few humans can jump more than 2 feet (0.6 m) straight up. Solve for the time one spends moving upward in a 2-foot vertical jump. Then double it for the "hang time" - the time one's feet are off the ground.
b) Calculate the vertical height of Michael Jordan's jump when he attains a hang time of a full 1 s.

a)
t=sqrt(2d/g) =sqrt(2(0.6 m))/9.8 =0.35 s

Hangtime=0.35 s x 2= 0.70 s

b)
d=(1/2)gt2=(1/2)(9.8 m/s2)(1.0 s)2= 4.9 m


Is this correct?
you forgot to divide the hang time by 2 in part b. part a is a ok.
 
Last edited:
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K