How high will UT bounce on a bungee jump from the Golden Gate Bridge?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a bungee jump scenario where the jumper, UT, jumps from a height of 65 meters. The discussion focuses on the energy transformations involved in the jump, particularly the potential energy and its conversion to elastic potential energy in the bungee cord.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculations related to potential energy and the velocity of the jumper at various points. Questions arise regarding the assumptions of no energy loss and the implications of this on the height UT could potentially reach after the jump.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of energy conservation in the context of the bungee jump. Some guidance has been offered regarding the transformation of gravitational potential energy to elastic potential energy, but no consensus has been reached on the correctness of specific statements or calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the ideal scenario of no energy loss due to friction or air resistance, which may not reflect real-world conditions. There is also a focus on how to articulate the physics concepts involved without relying solely on formulas.

Superman123
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
1. Ut will bungee jump from the golden gate bridge. The height that she will jump from is 65 meters. The rope pulls her up 8 meters above the water. If UT's weight is 63 kg, how far will the rubber rope pull her upwards, if there's no loss to friction or air resistance?

Homework Equations


PE= mgh
v=√2gh
v^2-u^2=2as

3. The Attempt at a Solution

I started by calculating the energy of the fall.
PE= 63*(65-8)*9.8= 35191 J

I then tried to calculate the velocity that she reaches when she is about to fall.
v=√2gh= 33.45 m/s

I then used v^2-u^2=2as, u^2 at the top is 0 and a= g=9.8 and s=h
v^2-u^2=2as
33.45^2-0= 2*9.82* s
s= 55.4 meters

That seems oddly wrong that she could reach such a height, is this the right way to do it or is there a mistake?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What happens if literally no energy is lost?
 
Well, the energy produced will be enough to bounce her back where she started, if nothing of it is lost; though I don't know how to present it with formulas to show that my reasoning is enough
 
Superman123 said:
Well, the energy produced will be enough to bounce her back where she started, if nothing of it is lost; though I don't know how to present it with formulas to show that my reasoning is enough

I would say you don't need any formulas, but you perhaps need to describe the scenario in physics terms. After all, if you push a vehicle along a flat, frictionless track, it doesn't come back to where it started.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Superman123
Is saying " The energy of the fall will be preserved in the rope and because there's no energy loss, the rope will pull up UT with the same energy, getting here to the same she started in." correct, considering physics terms?
 
Superman123 said:
Is saying " The energy of the fall will be preserved in the rope and because there's no energy loss, the rope will pull up UT with the same energy, getting here to the same she started in." correct, considering physics terms?

Perhaps better is that the initial gravitational PE is converted to elastic PE in the rope, then back to gravitational PE again ...
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Superman123
Oh, thanks for your time and help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
34K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
31K