Calculating Work and Energy for Moving Charges: A Case Study

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating work and energy associated with moving two charges, q1 and q2, which are initially separated by a distance and then moved further apart. The subject area includes concepts of electric potential energy and work done by electric fields and external agents.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between work done by the electric field and the external agent, exploring the signs of work and potential energy changes. There are attempts to clarify the equations used and the implications of the charges having opposite signs.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning their conclusions and the signs of the work done. Some guidance has been provided regarding the interpretation of potential energy and the relationship between the different states of the system. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the implications of their calculations and the specific requirements of the exercise, indicating a need for clarity on the signs of work and potential energy. There is also mention of potential integration of the Coulomb force as an alternative approach.

Fabio010
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
Two charges
q1 = 3.0µC and q2 = −4.0µC initially are separated by a distance ro = 2cm.

An external agent moves the charges until they are rf = 5cm apart.

a) How much work is done by the electric field moving the charged from ro to rf? Is it negative or positive? What is the work done by a external agent? Is it positive or negative?

Attempt:

-W = ΔU

Initial U = ke*(q1*q2)/(ro)

Final U = ke*(q1*q2)/(rf)

-W = ke*(q1*q2)/(rf) -ke*(q1*q2)/(ro) the work is positive.

Because the Wext = -W, then Wext is negative. I think that my attempt is wrong because in next questions it answers for the potential energy of the initial state...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fabio010 said:
the work is positive.

Your equations look good, but not the conclusion. Check the signs again.
 
first of all sorry for posting in the wrong section.


because rf > ro

ke*(q1*q2)/(rf) -ke*(q1*q2)/(ro) is going to be a negative number

so W = -ΔU , W is positive.

something is escaping me...?
 
Fabio010 said:
something is escaping me...?

The charges have opposite signs.
 
TSny said:
The charges have opposite signs.

damn... :)So the work done by the electric field is negative, and the work done by the external agent is positive.

But one more question. The following questions of the exercise are.

c) what is the potential energy of the initial state where the charges are ro = 2 cm apart?

d) what is the potential energy of the initial state where the charges are ro = 5 cm apart?

e) what is the change in potential energy from the initial state to the final state?Based in the logic of these questions, my answer for the first 2 questions (work done by the electric field and the external agent) is wrong. Don't you think so?
 
So, you've essentially already answered c, d, and e in answering a and b. Two possibilities: (1) maybe they want you to be clear on the signs of each quantity and how they are all related. (2) Maybe they want you to get the work in part (a) by explicit integration of the Coulomb force.

I don't know. But what you've done looks fine to me.
 
Ok thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
16K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
7K
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K