Calculating Work and Power on a Block on an Inclined Plane

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating work and power for a block being pulled up an inclined plane at a constant velocity. The problem involves concepts from mechanics, particularly forces, work, and energy, with specific parameters such as mass, distance, and friction coefficient provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between net force and work done, questioning whether the net work can be zero when the block is moving at constant velocity. They discuss the contributions of various forces, including tension, friction, and gravity, to the overall work done on the block.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, clarifying misunderstandings about the nature of work done on the block versus work done by specific forces. There is recognition that potential energy changes and friction play roles in the overall analysis, though no consensus has been reached on the specifics of the calculations.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note potential misinterpretations of the question, emphasizing the distinction between net work and work done by individual forces. The discussion reflects an ongoing examination of the assumptions underlying the problem setup.

SherlockOhms
Messages
309
Reaction score
0
Question:
A block of 0.5kg is pulled up an inclined plane by a tensile force at a constant velocity of 2m/s. Said block is pulled 15m up the incline. Sin(theta) = 1/3. The coefficient of kinetic direction is 0.08. Calculate the work done on the bock. Also, calculate the power applied to the block.

Relevant equations:
F=ma.
F(friction) = coefficient of kinetic friction x Reaction force.

Attempt at solution:
I'm not sure if I'm looking at this correctly but it seems to me that the net force will be 0. If it's pulled up at constant velocity then the net force is 0 and thus the net power and work is also 0. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Think about this. If your car is traveling at a constant 20 mph, is the engine doing any work?
 
Well, yes. It would be. I understand that the tensile force acting on the block will do work on the block. This tension will be equal to the sun of the other two opposing forces. Work will also be done against the other two forces. So, summing up to get the net work on the object wouldn't it sum up to be zero? You'd have the tensile force times the distance - the work done against the other two forces times the distance. Wouldn't this evaluate to 0?
 
Some of the work by the tensil force might go into increasing the potential energy, yes? Some of it might go into heat of friction? yes.
 
Ok. Am I just looking for the work done by the tensile force so? I'm not sure I follow what you're getting at.
 
Figure out what the tensile force is, then

W = FXD, yes?
 
Yup. That's great. Just misinterpreted the question so. Thanks for that.
 
I guess the problem is asking for net work and power, not work or power done by the tensile force against friction and gravity. So yes, net work and net power done by all forces evaluate to 0. You might want to consider the work energy theorem...net work done on an object by all forces acting on that object is equal to its change in kinetic energy. Any KE change?

Edit: Question is subject to misinterpretation.
 
Good point Phantom. The question was not the work done by the tensile force but the work done ON THE BLOCK. Wouldn't a change in potential energy be considered work on the block?
 
  • #10
Well, there'd be no change in kinetic energy. It's potential would obviously change though, yeah.
 
  • #11
The heat generated by friction would heat up the surface and the block, so some (not sure how much) of the friction work or heat would apply to the block, and some to the surface??
 
  • #12
And this would account for the change in potential, yes?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
797
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
Replies
2
Views
2K