Calculating Work Done for Decomposition of 2 moles NH4NO3 at 100°C

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the work done during the decomposition of 2 moles of NH4NO3 at 100°C. The correct formula for work done is identified as PΔV, rather than -RTΔn, emphasizing that the initial volume of the solid can typically be ignored due to its negligible size compared to the volume of gases produced. The final volume is significantly larger, making the approximation valid under standard conditions. The textbook's answer of -18.61 kJ is questioned, highlighting the importance of understanding the conditions under which the initial solid volume can be disregarded.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of thermodynamics, specifically the concepts of work and gas laws.
  • Familiarity with the ideal gas equation (PV=nRT).
  • Knowledge of phase changes and their impact on volume calculations.
  • Basic principles of stoichiometry related to chemical reactions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the ideal gas law and its applications in calculating work done in chemical reactions.
  • Study the effects of pressure on gas volumes and how it influences work calculations.
  • Explore the conditions under which the initial volume of solids can be ignored in thermodynamic calculations.
  • Examine case studies involving the decomposition of other compounds to understand variations in work done.
USEFUL FOR

Chemistry students, chemical engineers, and anyone involved in thermodynamics or reaction engineering will benefit from this discussion.

gracy
Messages
2,486
Reaction score
83

Homework Statement


Decomposition of 2 moles of NH4NO3 at 100 degrees C.calculate work done

Homework Equations


NH4NO3 (s)→N2O(g)+2H2O (g)
work done= - RT delta n here R=universal gas constant T=temperature in kelvin and
delta n=difference in number of moles of products and reactants.

The Attempt at a Solution

-I pluged in the values in formula work done= - RT delta n
=- 8.314j per kelvin per mol×373 kelvin ×3 mol
=- 9303.366 j
I took delta n =3 because i think delta number of moles in solid phase is taken as zero.Even if i don't number of moles in solid phase =0 rather I Take number of moles in solid phase = 1, I will get delta n =2 and then

work done= - RT delta n
=- 8.314 j per kelvin per mol ×373 kelvin ×2 mol
=- 6202.244 j
But according to my textbook answer should be - 18.61kj
please help.
[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gracy said:
work done= - RT delta n
=- 8.314j per kelvin per mol×373 kelvin ×3 mol
=- 9303.366 j

That's per decomposition of one mole of the nitrate. Now reread the question.

We ignore the initial volume of the solid as typically STP it is orders of magnitude smaller than the volume of gases produced (in the case of NH4NO3 it will be around 47 mL vs 66 L). It is often a good approximation, but not always.

Question is poorly written. 100°C doesn't guarantee water is in the gaseous form, for that pressure must be lower than 1 atm.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
can you please tell me why number of moles in solid phase is taken as zero?[/QUOTE]
 
I already did - that's because we can ignore its volume.

Work done is not RTΔn, but PΔV. From the ideal gas equation we know PV=nRT, so the volume of the gas produced is V=ΔnRT/P. In general ΔV is not just the volume of the gas produced, actually it is Vfinal-Vinitial. In the decomposition of ammonium nitrate, initial volume is that of a solid - around 47 mL per two moles (assuming density of the solid to be 1.7 g/mL). Final volume is orders of magnitude higher (measured in tens of liters), so we just ignore initial volume of the solid, as it is thousand times lower

In other words, as Vfinal >> Vinitial, Vfinal-Vinitial ≈ Vfinal.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Borek said:
Work done is not RTΔn, but PΔV
In my textbook Work done is given as RTΔn.I think it is like this pv=nRT and work done=p delta v so at constant temperature and pressure p delta v=delta n RT so work done=delta n RT.I want to ask can we take change in volume of solid=final volume in every case?
 
Last edited:
gracy said:
In my textbook Work done is given as RTΔn.I think it is like this pv=nRT and work done=p delta v so at constant temperature and pressure p delta v=delta n RT so work done=delta n RT.

Yes, that's what I wrote.

I want to ask can we take change in volume of solid=final volume in every case?

No idea what you mean. Volume of solid is not a final volume, I never stated anything like that. Please reread my explanation, I think I addressed what is going on quite clearly.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy
Borek said:
Yes, that's what I wrote.
No idea what you mean. Volume of solid is not a final volume, I never stated anything like that. Please reread my explanation, I think I addressed what is going on quite clearly.
If we have reactant which is solid ,can we just ignore initial volume of the solid in every case, is it thousand times lower than final volume in everycase? so that Vfinal >> Vinitial, Vfinal-Vinitial ≈ Vfinal.l.
 
gracy said:
can we just ignore initial volume of the solid in every case

Depends on the pressure - the higher the pressure, the lower the gas volume. If the pressure is high enough gas volume can be so low condition V
final >> Vinitial is no longer meet.
 
Borek said:
Depends on the pressure - the higher the pressure, the lower the gas volume. If the pressure is high enough gas volume can be so low condition V
final >> Vinitial is no longer meet.
so can you please tell me range,i mean how much high the pressure should be so that Vfinal >> Vinitial is no longer meet?It will help me to solve problems.
 
  • #10
In general, unless the conditions are somewhat exotic (very high pressures - hundreds of atm, very low temperatures - like -100°C), you don't have to worry about the initial solid volume.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: gracy

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K