I Calculation for angular excess

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the calculation of angular excess in spherical trigonometry, particularly in relation to a problem in general relativity. The user seeks clarity on whether angular excess and spherical excess are the same, noting that Girard's theorem relates the area of a spherical triangle to its spherical excess. They derive that for a sphere with radius a, the area equals a² times the spherical excess. Confusion arises regarding the presence of π in the equation for angular excess, leading to speculation that it may differ from spherical excess by a factor of π. The user concludes by questioning the accuracy of the book's equation, considering its publication date in the 1970s.
Haorong Wu
Messages
419
Reaction score
90
TL;DR
How to calculate the angular excess on a sphere?
Hello. I am not familiar with spherical trigonometry while I am reading a solution in a GR problem book. It reads,
If we construct a coordinate patch from geodesics we can then bisect that coordinate box with a geodesic diagonal, forming two geodesic triangles. The angular excess of a triangle made from great circles is ##\pi [Area/a^2]## where a is the radius of the sphere.

I study spherical trigonometry on Wikipedia and some other sites, but I am still not sure how to calculate the angular excess.

First, is angular excess equivalent to spherical excess? I have not found a clear definition for angular excess. But the definition for spherical excess makes me think that they are the same concept. Maybe angular excess is just an old-fashioned name?

Second, Girard's theorem states that the area of a spherical triangle is equal to its spherical excess.

Then for a sphere with radius ##a##, Girard's theorem gives that ##Area=a^2 \times E## where ##E## is the spherical excess.

So the spherical excess is given by ##E=Area/a^2##.

Now I am not sure where the ##\pi## comes from. Maybe angular excess differs from spherical excess by a factor ##\pi##?

Thanks!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Try looking at parts of a sphere where you can calculate these numbers. For example two meridians at right angles and the equator. Area is ##\frac{\pi}{2}## while angle sum is ##\frac{3\pi}{2}## for a=1 (I can never trust my arithmetic - check it). It looks like ##\pi## is already there.
 
Thanks, @mathman . I got the same answer. So I am not sure whether the equation given in the book is wrong, or because it was defined so in the old days since the book is published in the 1970s.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K