MHB Calculation of angles in normal anatomical curved bones that are fractured.

thormunch
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi,
I am an orthopedic surgeon. Many of our long bones are anatomically curved. When they fracture they sometimes heal in a none perfect/anatomic position.

How do one calculate the angle/curve or changed angle/curve of a fractured bone healed or fixed none anatomically

Please see my drawn illutration
 

Attachments

Mathematics news on Phys.org
thormunch said:
Hi,
I am an orthopedic surgeon. Many of our long bones are anatomically curved. When they fracture they sometimes heal in a none perfect/anatomic position.

How do one calculate the angle/curve or changed angle/curve of a fractured bone healed or fixed none anatomically

Please see my drawn illutration

Hi thormunch! Welcome to MHB!

The angle a bone makes is determined by 2 lines that identify the direction of the bone at either end.
If you find these lines for the bone with and without fracture, you can find the change in angle.

So I assume your challenge is how to find such lines?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top