Calculation of vibronic couplings

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of vibronic couplings as detailed in the paper by Cederbaum, Domcke, and Köppel. The user seeks clarification on eliminating the dependence of fermionic ladder operators on nuclear coordinates within the Hamiltonian framework. Key equations include the Hamiltonian expressions and the projection of ladder operators onto a Q-independent basis. The user identifies a gap in understanding the derivation of off-diagonal coupling terms, specifically the lambda parameters, and requests assistance in resolving this mathematical issue.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second quantization notation
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics in quantum chemistry
  • Knowledge of fermionic ladder operators
  • Experience with Taylor expansions in mathematical derivations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of linear vibronic coupling parameters in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the application of Taylor expansions in quantum chemistry
  • Research fermionic operators and their role in quantum Hamiltonians
  • Examine the implications of off-diagonal coupling terms in vibronic coupling calculations
USEFUL FOR

Quantum chemists, theoretical physicists, and researchers focused on vibronic coupling and Hamiltonian dynamics in molecular systems.

slawa
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

I'm referring to the paper Chem. Phys. v.26 pp.169-177 y.1977 from Cederbaum, Domcke and Köppel where the expressions for linear vibronic coupling parameters are derived in second quantization notation. I'm stuck on the point, where the dependence of the fermionic ladder operators on the nuclear coordinates is eliminated. To be more specific:

H = ∑ii(0)aiai +∑i (0.50.5∂∊i/∂Q)[aiai-ni]Q

is the part of the Hamiltonian I'm interested in. Here the fermionic ladder operators are still dependend on the nuclear coordinates Q (for simplicity let there be just one of it at this time). Now by projecting the ladder operator on an Q-independend basis

ai(Q) = ∑ji(Q)|ϕj(0)>aj(0)

these parts of the hamiltonian should look like:

ii(0)aiai +∑i 0.50.5Qi[aiai-ni]Q + ∑i,j λi,j[aiaj+ajai]Q

where the lambdas are given by

λi,j = lim Q→0[∊i(Q)-∊j(Q)]<ϕj(Q)|∂Qi(Q)>

Up to now I'm pretty shure that I understand how to get the first two summands of the new hamiltonian but the off diagonal coupling term with the lambdas...My last point was, that from the last term in the old hamiltonian leftover terms like this one

-∂Q1(0)[<ϕ1(0)|ϕ1(Q)>a11(Q)|ϕ2(0)>a2+<ϕ2(0)|ϕ1(Q)>a21(Q)|ϕ1(0)>a1]Q-∂Q2(0)[<ϕ1(0)|ϕ2(Q)>a12(Q)|ϕ2(0)>a2+<ϕ2(0)|ϕ2(Q)>a22(Q)|ϕ1(0)>a1]Q

have to become the third summand in the new hamiltonian...Here some link is missing.

Further they state, that from going from the general expression for the lambdas to a two state system, the lambdas can be written as:

λ1,2=0.75*(∂Q22[∊1(Q)-∊2(Q)]2)00.5

So here I'm obviously missing some math ;)

I'd appreciate some help and sorry for the load of equations :|

Greetings
Slawa
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the step you are missing is a simple taylor expansion of their eq 6: ## \langle \phi_i(Q)|\phi_j(0)\rangle=\langle \phi_i(0)| \phi_j(0)\rangle +\langle \partial \phi_i(Q)/\partial Q|_{Q=0} |\phi_j(0) \rangle Q ##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K