Calculus I - Area Between Curves - Mistake on Answer Key

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of the area between curves in a calculus context, specifically focusing on the integration limits when integrating with respect to y. Participants are examining the implications of integrating from different limits and the resulting area calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the appropriateness of integrating from 0 to 25 versus 25 to 0, particularly in relation to producing a positive area. There are discussions about the points of intersection and the reasoning behind the choice of limits for integration.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided differing perspectives on the integration limits, with one asserting that integrating from 0 to 25 yields a positive area, while another participant initially believed it produced a negative area. There is an acknowledgment of potential calculator errors and a clarification regarding the use of vertical versus horizontal strips in area calculations.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the nuances of integration limits and the conditions under which areas are calculated, with some confusion about the implications of the order of limits. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and clarifications regarding standard practices in calculus.

GreenPrint
Messages
1,186
Reaction score
0
This is the answer key to one of my quizzes

If you notice in the question, see attachment, were it says to integrate with respect to y the integral is integrating from 0 to 25 but this produces a negative area so this is technically wrong, yes? You don't just simply integrate from the lower value to the upper value for all cases? Like in this problem the proper integral would of been from 25 to 0 were your actually integrating from the higher value to the lower value... the reasoning behind this is because the higher valued limit appear to the left of the lower value limit 0 so the x coordinate of the higher value limit is -5 which is less than the x coordinate of the lower valued limit 0

the points of intersection of the functions are:
(-5,25)(0,0)
so is my reasoning correct for as to why you actually would integrate from 25 to 0 instead of 0 to 25 to produce a positive area?
 

Attachments

  • mistake.JPG
    mistake.JPG
    16.3 KB · Views: 478
Physics news on Phys.org
GreenPrint said:
This is the answer key to one of my quizzes

If you notice in the question, see attachment, were it says to integrate with respect to y the integral is integrating from 0 to 25 but this produces a negative area so this is technically wrong, yes?
No. Integrating from 0 to 25 produces a positive number, 125/6, the same as the other integral.
GreenPrint said:
You don't just simply integrate from the lower value to the upper value for all cases? Like in this problem the proper integral would of been from 25 to 0 were your actually integrating from the higher value to the lower value... the reasoning behind this is because the higher valued limit appear to the left of the lower value limit 0 so the x coordinate of the higher value limit is -5 which is less than the x coordinate of the lower valued limit 0

the points of intersection of the functions are:
(-5,25)(0,0)
so is my reasoning correct for as to why you actually would integrate from 25 to 0 instead of 0 to 25 to produce a positive area?
 
I got a positive area doing it the way it's written on the answer key.
 
Hm I guess I entered it into my calculator wrong thanks, so it's always the integral from the lower value to the higher value after all than?
 
Yes, if you are using vertical strips. The area of one of these vertical strips is (<upper y value> - <lower y value>) * dx.

If you're using horizontal strips, the area of a strip is (<right x value> - <left x value>) * dy.
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K