this is one of those things that looks like it should be really simple but for some reason i just don't get it i've looked at a few books and they all start explaining calculus of variations in the same way.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

i'll quote a paragraph from feynmann lectures II (concerning finding the path of least action) just to illustrate my problem:

"When we have a quantity which has a minimum - for instance, in an ordinary function like temperature - one of the properties of the minimum is that if we go away from the minimum in thefirstorder, the deviation of the function from its minimum value is onlysecondorder. At any place else on the curve, if we move a small distance the value of the function changes also in the first order. But at a minimum, a tiny motion away makes, in the first approximation, no difference."

now, what is meant by first and second order in this context? i honestly don't get what is meant here. surely if you move away from the minimum of a function, the function changes according to itself. e.g. if f(x) = x^2, then if you move away from the minimum x=0 in the x-direction, f(x) changes by x^2. so what is meant by nothing changing in the first order?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Calculus of variations basic question

Loading...

Similar Threads - Calculus variations basic | Date |
---|---|

I Euler’s approach to variational calculus | Feb 18, 2018 |

A Maximization problem using Euler Lagrange | Feb 2, 2018 |

A Maximization Problem | Jan 31, 2018 |

A Derivation of Euler Lagrange, variations | Aug 26, 2017 |

I Calculus of variations | Aug 19, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**