Calculus Taylor Approximation Proof

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion focuses on proving that if |nx| < 1, the Taylor approximation of (1+x)^n is exact up to the x^2 order. Participants utilize the Taylor Expansion for both sides, leading to the conclusion that the left-hand side (LHS) and right-hand side (RHS) match up to the x^2 term. The LHS is expressed as 1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2, while the RHS is derived from the exponential form e^(n(x-(1/2)x^2)). The discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly interpreting the condition |nx| < 1 as a prerequisite for the equality rather than a result to be proven.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Taylor Series expansions
  • Familiarity with exponential functions and their properties
  • Knowledge of inequalities and their implications in calculus
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of Taylor Series for exponential functions
  • Explore the implications of the inequality |nx| < 1 in calculus
  • Learn about the convergence criteria for Taylor Series
  • Investigate the relationship between Taylor approximations and binomial expansions
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, mathematicians focusing on approximation methods, and anyone interested in the application of Taylor Series in mathematical proofs.

Elvin Rivera
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Member warned about deleting the template
1. The question is. Show that if |nx| <1, the following is exact up to (and including) the x^2 order. The hint giving says to use the Taylor Expansion for both sides of the equation2. (1+x)^n = e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) ; the n(x-(1/2)x^2) is all an exponent3. My first attempt was to take the taylor series of both sides. The left hand side is pretty easy.

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = LHS

the right hand side gives the same thing though

f(0) = RHS = 1
f'(0) = n(1-x)e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = n
f''(0) = -n*e^n(x-(1/2)x^2 + n^2 (1+x)^2 * e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = -n + n^2

which in the taylor series gives the same as the LHS

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = RHS

but now I'm stuck... how do I show that |nx| < 1
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Elvin Rivera said:
1. The question is. Show that if |nx| <1, the following is exact up to (and including) the x^2 order. The hint giving says to use the Taylor Expansion for both sides of the equation2. (1+x)^n = e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) ; the n(x-(1/2)x^2) is all an exponent
Then use parentheses to make that clear: (1+ x)^n= e^(n(x- (1/2)x^2)).
3. My first attempt was to take the taylor series of both sides. The left hand side is pretty easy.

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = LHS

the right hand side gives the same thing though

f(0) = RHS = 1
f'(0) = n(1-x)e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = n
f''(0) = -n*e^n(x-(1/2)x^2 + n^2 (1+x)^2 * e^n(x-(1/2)x^2) = -n + n^2

which in the taylor series gives the same as the LHS

1 + nx + (n/2)(n-1)x^2 = RHS

but now I'm stuck... how do I show that |nx| < 1
You don't- that is not what is asked. You are asked to show that if |nx|< 1 then that equality is true, not the other way around.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
HallsofIvy said:
Then use parentheses to make that clear: (1+ x)^n= e^(n(x- (1/2)x^2)).
You don't- that is not what is asked. You are asked to show that if |nx|< 1 then that equality is true, not the other way around.

Any hint on how to start that?
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K