Can a 16-Year-Old Solve the Dirichlet Problem Better Than Mathematicians?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter QuantumTheory
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a 16-year-old who has reportedly found a new way to solve the Dirichlet problem. Participants express amazement at his achievement and discuss the implications of such a young mathematician's work, including references to competitions and the potential for future contributions to mathematics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express admiration for the 16-year-old's achievement, noting the difficulty of the mathematics involved.
  • Questions arise regarding the publication status of his work, with some participants seeking references to a paper or formal publication.
  • There is a discussion about the potential for more young mathematicians like him, with references to the Riemann hypothesis.
  • Some participants debate the merits of homeschooling as a factor in producing advanced young mathematicians.
  • Others argue that advanced mathematics is not inherently extraordinary for teenagers, suggesting that educational systems could foster more young talent if structured differently.
  • The subjective nature of success is discussed, with differing opinions on what constitutes a productive contribution to society.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of admiration and skepticism regarding the implications of the young mathematician's achievement. There is no consensus on the significance of his work or the educational factors contributing to such talent.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note the lack of available information regarding the young mathematician's paper and express frustration over the absence of published work despite media attention.

  • #31
rachmaninoff said:
I've asked this already, does anyone know if he's published a paper on this subject, or if this is some sort of pre-emptive scholarship? It's frustrating that for all the publicity he's getting, I can't look at his actual achievement for myself. His presentation was titled, "On the Solution of the Dirichlet Problem with Rational Boundary Data", that's all I've found.
Perhaps it will be published in the Journal. Oftern the journals which I read have a provision that the work is new and unpublished.

I am not sure what the time frame is for releasing the papers or projects of the Siemens-Westinghouse Science Competition, but it the works must be published or available at the competition. Afterall, the works have to be reviewed. One could contact the students advsior in the math department at UCSD.

Perhaps in time, the work will be published.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Yeah, you have to wait.

You still have the review process, or atleast wait for the next journal to come out.

Patience.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
10K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
9K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K