Can a bipyramidal figure be achieved with 5 points on a sphere?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Alkatran
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points Sphere
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the arrangement of five points on a sphere, exploring the most equitable distribution of these points while maximizing the average distance between them. Participants consider various geometric configurations, including the potential for a bipyramidal structure and the limitations imposed by existing geometric principles.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the optimal arrangement for five points on a sphere could be the vertices of a pentagon.
  • Another participant proposes the five vertices of a double tetrahedron as a possible configuration.
  • A different participant argues against the double tetrahedron, stating that it does not meet the criteria of equivalence due to unequal distances from certain points.
  • One participant asserts that aside from planar arrangements, only the vertices of convex regular polyhedra can satisfy the criteria for point distribution.
  • Another participant mentions that there are at least two arrangements for every even number of points, suggesting the formation of parallel polygons as a solution.
  • A later reply introduces the concept of a bipyramidal figure, indicating a configuration involving two superposed tetrahedra.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the feasibility of various configurations for five points on a sphere. There is no consensus on the best arrangement, and multiple competing ideas are presented.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights limitations related to the geometric properties of point arrangements and the conditions under which certain configurations may or may not be equivalent. The exploration of arc length versus direct distance is also noted as a potential factor in evaluating arrangements.

Alkatran
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
959
Reaction score
0
Say you have a sphere, and n points to place on it. You want each of the points to be equivalent to the others if you allow relabeling and the average distance between points should be as great as possible. Essentially the most spread out 'fair' distribution of points when no point is special compared to the others.

For example: when n = 4, the points would be the vertices of a tetrahedron. When n = 6, the points would be the centers of the faces of a cube. When n = 3 the points would be the vertices of a triangle.

My question is: with 5 points, the only possible layout I have found is the vertices a pentagon. Is there a better one?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Have you considered the five vertices of a double tetrahedron?
 
I don't think a double tetrahedron will work. The three points at the joining point have all the other points equidistant from them, but the two points away from it do not.

Code:
  1
 /|\
2-3-4
 \|/
  5

1 is further away from 5 than any point is from 4, therefore no relabeling can make 1 equivalent to 4. However, this may not be true if we take arc length into account (which is what really matters in this case) or move 1 and 5 closer together... but I have no experience with this type of geometry.
 
Last edited:
Based on your rejection of the double tetrahedron, there is no arrangement of five points (or almost any value of N) other than planar that satisfies your criteria. The exceptions are the vertices of the convex regular polyhedra. There are only five convex regular polyhedra, aka the Platonic solids: the regular tetrahedron, hexahedron (cube), octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron.
 
D H said:
Based on your rejection of the double tetrahedron, there is no arrangement of five points (or almost any value of N) other than planar that satisfies your criteria. The exceptions are the vertices of the convex regular polyhedra. There are only five convex regular polyhedra, aka the Platonic solids: the regular tetrahedron, hexahedron (cube), octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron.

I assumed this might happen. However, I do know there are at least two arrangements for every even number of points. Just make two parallel (n/2)-gons out of the points (the n=6 and n=8 solutions examples of this). This will have a higher average distance than the simple n-gon. There's also the trivial "all points at the same spot" solution, haha.
 
From what I know about molecular geometry, what you are looking for is a bipyramidal figure, where you basically have two superposed tetrahedron.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
7K