Can a connected metric space with at least two points be countable?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SiddharthM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Metric
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Every connected metric space with at least two points is uncountable. The proof utilizes the function f: X-->[0,∞) defined by f(x)=d(p,x), demonstrating that if X were countable, f could not be onto. This leads to a contradiction as the inverse images of distinct nonnegative reals yield an uncountable union of disjoint nonempty sets, contradicting the assumption that X is countable. The discussion also notes that while path connection implies connectedness, it is a stronger condition, as illustrated by a specific example of a connected but not path-connected space.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concepts of connectedness and path connectedness
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Basic understanding of functions and their properties in topology
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of connected metric spaces in detail
  • Learn about path connectedness and its implications in topology
  • Explore proof techniques in topology, focusing on proof by contradiction
  • Investigate specific examples of connected but not path-connected spaces
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of topology, and anyone interested in the properties of metric spaces and their implications in advanced mathematics.

SiddharthM
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
I was doing a Rudin problem and wanted to know if there was a cleaner way of going about this - maybe a direct one.

So the question asks to prove that every connected metric space with at least two points is uncountable. The hint given in Rudin uses the thm below

Fix p in X, delta greater than zero, define A to be the delta neighborhood of p and B to be all x in X s.t. d(p,x)>delta. Then A and B are separated.

The show that a connected metric space with at least 2 points cannot be countable I show that the function f: X-->[0,infinity), with f(x)=d(p,x)

cannot be onto under the assumption that X is countable.* Hence there is a positive delta I can apply the above theorem (if the range of X under f is bounded then use supf(X)=alpha and apply the same idea to the function f:X-->[0,alpha)..that is show that the function cannot be onto) to show X is disconnected to give a contradiction.

* The argument here is assume that it is onto, then for each x in the nonnegative reals inversef(x) we get a nonempty subset of X. If x and y are distinct nonnegative reals then it's easy to see that inversef(x) and inversef(y) are disjoint sets. Then inversef([0,infinity) ) is an uncountable union of nonempty disjoint sets and is therefore uncountable and a subset of X which yields a contradiction. Hence there is a delta in [0,infinity) s.t. inversef(delta) is empty.

It's a bit lumpy with all the proof-by-contradictions. Btw, I'm ommitting the inductive proof that shows X cannot be finite.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The way you ruled out the finite case should work with the countable infinite case as well.

If we had path connection, then we could transport the connectedness of an interval by a continuity argument onto ##X##. But path connection is stronger than connection. E.g.
$$
X=\{\,(0,y)\,|\,-1\leq y\leq 1\,\}\cup \{\,(x,\sin \frac{1}{x})\,\,|\,x\in \mathbb{R}-\{\,0\,\}\}
$$
is connected but not path connected.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K