Can a Formula 1 Car Outperform a Rugby Scrum in a Race?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Car Formula
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the performance comparison between a Formula 1 car and a rugby scrum in a race scenario. Key points include the importance of traction over raw power, as F1 cars rely heavily on aerodynamics and downforce rather than sheer horsepower. The discussion highlights that the car's performance is influenced by tire compound, ground surface, and temperature. Additionally, strategies for maximizing friction, such as using the right tire compound and managing braking, are crucial for optimizing performance in such a unique competition.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of F1 car aerodynamics and downforce
  • Knowledge of tire compounds, specifically 'hard' and 'supersoft' compounds
  • Familiarity with traction dynamics and ground surface effects
  • Basic principles of vehicle braking systems, including anti-lock brakes
NEXT STEPS
  • Research F1 car aerodynamics and its impact on traction
  • Learn about different tire compounds and their performance characteristics
  • Explore the physics of traction and ground surface interactions
  • Investigate advanced braking techniques and their effects on vehicle performance
USEFUL FOR

Automotive engineers, motorsport enthusiasts, and anyone interested in the physics of vehicle performance and traction dynamics.

Messages
19,865
Reaction score
10,860
Not saying this is fake, but it seems pretty incredible to me. Can anyone shine some light on this?

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Beyond being stupidly dangerous?
 
Borg said:
Beyond being stupidly dangerous?
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
Well, they are rugby players so they're probably used to it. :oldtongue:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: billy_joule and Nick tringali
I think it is not about power, it is about traction. Technically F1 cars are grounded airplanes. At the start they have only to accelerate themselves, i.e. about 500 kg. In the video likely 50 kg less (fuel). The racing speed comes from the aerodynamically generated downforce. So there is no extra downforce here and optimizing acceleration means optimizing for 500 kg. During the race the cars become faster as they loose weight.
So the entire setup isn't optimized for power rather it is for speed. In addition traction depends on air- and road-temperature, chosen tires and so on. I'm not surprised.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Greg Bernhardt
Top Gear did a similar test a few years ago with a tug of war team, it's down to the force you can put onto the ground, once the tyres start to spin the car has lost it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
You can't even get it rolling without technical help. A computer regulates the clutch. Otherwise you stall the engine. So part of the equation is not only the tires but the computer program, too, and this isn't programmed to overcome additional resistance. And because F1 cars are airplanes a more powerful car can't even overtake a slower one (beside on an endless straight like on salt lakes). So they have invented tricks to make it happen.
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
There seems to be more "spin" going on than just the tires :wink:
 
Greg Bernhardt said:
Which is one reason I am skeptical because if someone slips they could all be run over.
1oldman2 said:
There seems to be more "spin" going on than just the tires :wink:
Plus: real Rugby players do not slip in a scrum! Never!

R.I.P. Jerry Collins
 
  • #10
Hmm, what strategy maximizes the F1 cars friction? It would guess turning off the motor and braking lightly enough that the brakes slip a little but the tires don't. This can be done indefinitely. Wait until the rugby players get tired before firing up the engine.

But that does seem kind of like cheating.

My car has anti-lock brakes but to me they seem to be completely ineffective. Light braking is better.
 
  • #11
I wanted to chime in for no other reason than I'm a big F1 fan myself (and former rugby player). In this instance, the traction of the car is going to be affected by the ground surface and the compound of tyre (for the most part). We can't see anything about the surface other than it's asphalt but the car is utilizing the 'hard' compound of tyre - it's called the hard compound because it's the hardest tyre that car has been fitted with (I can tell this because of the orange band around the inside of the tyre). Additionally, that compound also takes the most time to get up to proper working temperature to maximize grip; however, spinning the wheels as in the video will quickly overheat them and the tread will simply get worn away. Perhaps the car could have been fitted with 'supersoft' tyres that would provide more grip over the tyre featured in the video. Interesting that the result seems to be a draw between car and scrum :smile:.

As some have alluded to, the F1 car isn't really the best choice to demonstrate "off the line" power since much of the grip generated by the car comes from aerodynamics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2
  • #12
Nosebuckle said:
As some have alluded to, the F1 car isn't really the best choice to demonstrate "off the line" power since much of the grip generated by the car comes from aerodynamics.

Like my daddy told me, when driving against a rugby scrum, heavy is better.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 56 ·
2
Replies
56
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K