Can a Good Researcher Be a Bad Student?

  • Thread starter Thread starter missfangula
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Student
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the relationship between research skills and academic performance, specifically whether a person can excel in research while being a poor student. Participants explore the different skill sets required for successful research and academic achievement, sharing personal experiences and observations.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that being a good student and a good researcher requires different skills, with independent thinking and organization being crucial for research success.
  • Others argue that while strong academic performance is important, it is possible for individuals to excel in research despite struggling with coursework.
  • One participant notes that many good researchers who are poor students may fail qualifying exams in graduate school, indicating a need for a baseline level of academic competence.
  • Another participant highlights the reverse scenario, where high-performing students may falter in independent research tasks, suggesting that both skill sets are necessary for overall success.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that there are distinct skills involved in being a good student versus a good researcher, but multiple competing views remain regarding the implications of this distinction for academic and research success.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the lack of consensus on what constitutes "good" performance in either domain and the potential variability in individual experiences and definitions of success.

missfangula
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Is this possible? I find myself thriving in the research environment, but I would not call myself a very good student...are there different skills involved, from your experience? Has this happened to anyone else?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What I've found is that the best students don't always make the best researchers because of exactly what you've mentioned: there are different skills involved. There are a lot of people who become very good at being a students - who solve any problem set you can come up with and write spectacular reports, etc - but when it comes to the independent thinking and organization required to define a research project, they fall apart.

That said, to be a good researcher you should be at least a reasonable student. It is extremely difficult to go from a state where you stuggle with basic concepts to one where you can make significant progress in an uncharted field.
 
I've seen several good researchers but bad students wash out of grad school when they hit the qualifying exams. You need to be good enough to get past that hurdle, and then it won't matter as much afterward if you're not great at coursework.
 
eri said:
I've seen several good researchers but bad students wash out of grad school when they hit the qualifying exams.

That happens. So does the reverse - the student who smokes all his tests, but when he has to do something independent, he crumbles. You need some degree of aptitude in both areas to succeed.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 92 ·
4
Replies
92
Views
8K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
5K