Admissions Can a non-academic write a strong letter of recommendation for grad school?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dsaun777
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Recommendation
AI Thread Summary
Letters of recommendation for graduate school typically address a candidate's academic abilities, personal qualities, and potential for success in graduate studies. While the primary focus is on academic qualifications, having a letter from an employer can still be valuable, especially if the employer can speak to the candidate's interpersonal skills, reliability, and work ethic. It's important for candidates to communicate their goals to their recommenders, ensuring the letters highlight relevant strengths. Admissions committees look for assurance that the applicant will thrive in a graduate environment, so letters from those familiar with the academic landscape are particularly beneficial. A diverse set of recommendations, including one from a non-academic source, can provide a well-rounded view of the candidate.
dsaun777
Messages
296
Reaction score
39
I am sure there are some people who were in positions to write letters of recommendation for grad students. What do these letters typically ask for? I am asking because I am requesting letters of recommendation from one of my employers and from 3 professors. My job has little to do with the grad field that I am applying to. I am worried that this might be offputting for the admissions department if my employer writes a great recommendation but lacks any sort of relevance to the science field. What are typical questions of these letters?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Paart of your value as a graduate student is your ability to interact, perhaps to teach, to be reliable and personable. Obviously the first concern is that you have the academic "chops" to do the work, and that is primary, but I see nothing wrong with one letter from a satisfied employer who knows you well. The other letters will need to speak to academics: presumably their authors know the ropes. It is not unusual to take a few minutes to explain your hopes to your professor so she knows what the best emphasis might be.
 
The letter needs to answer the question "will this person succeed in graduate school". Having people who have been through graduate school obviously helps a lot. You may want to keep this in mind when asking a non-academic.

Great example: a guy asked his girlfriend's father for a letter. He thought it was a great idea that the young man went on to grad school. Ideally one far away. Far, far away.
 
  • Like
Likes dsaun777 and hutchphd
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
I have a specialization in condensed matter physics and materials physics, and off-late, I have been seeing a lot of research directions moving towards quantum computing (AMO and non-linear optics) and the huge chunk of quantum materials research (and funding) is dedicated towards QIS and QC research. I am wondering (sort of in a dilemma), if I should consider switching my field? I am currently at the stage of a postdoc.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
63
Views
8K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Back
Top