Can a nonempty set has probability zero?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rukawakaede
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Set Zero
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
5 replies · 4K views
rukawakaede
Messages
58
Reaction score
0
Reworded version:

I think I need to re-word as follow:

Can a nonempty set X with P(X)=0?

Suppose F to be a non-empty set with [tex]P(F)\neq 0[/tex]. Call its closure be F'.

Now let set theoretic different F'\F be A. Clearly, A could be non-empty.
Is this the case where P(A)=0?

Is not, how do you relate P(F) and P(F')?=================================Original version:
Can a nonempty set X has P(X)=0?

My thought is suppose a nonempty set F then its closure F'\F=A where P(A)=0.

Is this true??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
rukawakaede said:
Can a nonempty set X has P(X)=0?

My thought is suppose a nonempty set F then its closure F'\F=A where P(A)=0.

Is this true??

No. The closure of a set of probability 0 could have probability 1
 
lavinia said:
No. The closure of a set of probability 0 could have probability 1

I think I need to re-word as follow:

Suppose F to be a non-empty set with [tex]P(F)\neq 0[/tex]. Call its closure be F'.

Now let set theoretic different F'\F be A. Clearly, A could be non-empty.
Is this the case where P(A)=0?

Is not, how do you relate P(F) and P(F')?
 
Last edited:
Think of an absolutely continuous distribution (Gaussian as one example). The interval (0,1) could have non-zero probability. Its closure is [0,1], also with non-zero probability, but the difference you reference is [tex]\{0,1\}[/tex] which has zero probability.
 
lavinia said:
No. The closure of a set of probability 0 could have probability 1

Of course: throw a dart at the real line. Then P(hitting a rational)=0, but

P(hitting some element in Cl(Q))=1

Then this is also an example of a set being non-empty, yet having probability zero.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for those commented above.
Now I understand that the probability of a set and probability its closure equals depends on the probability measure (or probability mass function) and of course the set itself.