Can a Physicist Engineer a New Dental Prosthesis Method?

  • Context: Medical 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ruslan_Sharipov
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the implementation of a new dental prosthesis method proposed by an engineer and physicist, who seeks to maintain authorship while collaborating with dental surgeons. Key steps include convincing a dental surgeon to test the method, likely starting with an animal model, and adhering to local clinical trial procedures. The importance of conducting supporting analysis and potentially developing specialized software is emphasized, as well as the necessity of experimental evidence for publication in medical journals.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of clinical trial procedures for surgical innovations
  • Knowledge of dental prosthesis techniques and materials
  • Familiarity with medical research publication standards
  • Basic skills in software development for medical applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research local clinical trial regulations for surgical innovations
  • Learn about dental prosthesis design and mounting techniques
  • Study medical journal publication requirements and co-authorship guidelines
  • Explore software development for analyzing surgical techniques and outcomes
USEFUL FOR

Dental surgeons, biomedical engineers, researchers in surgical innovation, and anyone interested in the intersection of engineering and dental medicine.

Ruslan_Sharipov
Messages
104
Reaction score
1
I am an engineer and physicist by education. I am currently applied as a math educator (PhD and associate professor in a university in Russia). However, I have an idea of a new way for mounting a single tooth prosthesis into a jaw bone. Please, give me an advice, what should I do in order to implement my idea into the surgical practice and keep my authorship of it.
 
Biology news on Phys.org
Convince a dental surgeon to implement your idea, probably in an animal model. There are established procedures (which vary be location) for clinical trials in surgical innovation. The surgeon would know how to do this in your area.

If your new technique requires special software to be written or analysis of why it would work then you should do do that part. Then you can coauthor a paper in a medical journal with the surgeon. If it was really your idea in the beginning, and you did all the supporting analysis then you should be the first author.

It would almost certainly be unpublishable without experimental evidence that it works.

P.S. If you are the Ruslan Sharipov who wrote those online mathematics textbooks. I used them as an undergraduate, they're very good. I learned a lot from them.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K