Can a Rubber Band Replace a Steel Spring in Measuring Weight?

  • Thread starter Thread starter OVB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hooke's law Law
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the use of rubber bands versus steel springs in measuring weight, the elasticity of materials in structural applications, and the relationship between force and displacement in different gravitational contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore whether a rubber band can effectively replace a steel spring in a scale, questioning the linearity of deflection in relation to weight. They also discuss the elasticity required for materials used in suspension bridges and the concept of elasticity in metals under stress.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the principles of Hooke's law and the behavior of materials under load. There is an ongoing exploration of the concepts without a clear consensus, as various interpretations and reasoning are being discussed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with definitions of elasticity, the implications of material properties in practical applications, and the effects of gravity on measurements, indicating some uncertainty in their understanding of these concepts.

OVB
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
I think I am getting some concepts confused, so i need help clarifying the answers to the following questions:

1. can you use a rubber band instead of a steel spring in a scale to measure weight?
- I said no, because it would break
2. Should the wires supporting a suspension bridge be elastic or inelastic?
- I said elastic so that it can return to its original position, but I don't know how to expand on this...

3. How is a steel wire "very elastic" if it does not stretch much with large forces?
- I am not sure at all about this oneAnd k is independent of gravity right? (i.e., if you have a force and a displacement on earth, would those be in the same proportion on the moon? I'm thinking F/x = k equals a direct proportion but I might be breaking smoe rules).

I spent a good hour before and that is the progress I have made.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
does anyone know?
 
I explained rather well what I knew and what I didn't. Am I being ignored for something I left out or does no one know?
 
1. can you use a rubber band instead of a steel spring in a scale to measure weight?
- I said no, because it would break

Well, no is the right answer, but the reasoning is not correct.

1. In order to measure weight, the deflection must be linearly proportional to the weight - that is the point of Hooke's law. Only this way can one obtain a uniformly graduated scale. Steel spring could also be overloaded into the inelastic region, in which case it would be permanently deformed.

A rubber band is non-linear. The cross-section changes as it stretches. One might try and experiment with a suitable rubber band. Load it up with gram weights e.g. 1g, 2g, 3g, . . . and see if the deflection is a constant multiple of the mass.

The spring constant is a property of the metal and independent of gravity. The weight of something is a measure of the gravitational force on the mass - W = mg.

2. If a metal is stressed into the inelastic range, there will be permanent deformation. Structures are designed such the materials in the components operate well below the yield strength, i.e. well within the elastic range. When a structure is loaded then unloaded, as happens when a vehicle crosses a bridge, then the structure must return to its original unloaded form. Bridges are designed to deflect under load, but not by much. Many (or most) structures tend to be very stiff - i.e. resist displacement.

3. If a metal is highly loaded, and still does not stretch (which I take to mean 'permanently deform'), then it has a 'large elastic' range.

When metals are deformed, they are worked beyond the elastic range (yield strength) and they are plastically deformed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
14K