Can a straight wire be a self inductor?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter overtak3n
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inductor Self Wire
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A straight wire does exhibit self-inductance, contrary to some initial misconceptions in the discussion. The self-inductance of a straight wire can be quantified using the formula LuF = 0.2 * s * (Loge(4 * s / d) – ¾), where 's' is the length and 'd' is the diameter of the wire. The discussion also clarifies that a changing magnetic field, which can involve variations in magnetic field strength, induces current, a principle foundational to generator operation. Maxwell's equations provide a comprehensive framework for understanding the relationships between electric and magnetic fields.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic electromagnetic principles
  • Familiarity with self-inductance and its mathematical representation
  • Knowledge of Maxwell's equations
  • Basic calculus for interpreting differential forms
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of self-inductance for different wire configurations
  • Learn about the applications of Maxwell's equations in electromagnetic theory
  • Explore the concept of magnetic flux and its relation to magnetic fields
  • Investigate the principles of electromagnetic induction and its applications in generators
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, electrical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of electromagnetism and self-inductance in electrical circuits.

overtak3n
Messages
27
Reaction score
0
I hope this is posted in the correct thread.
When I was still in my physics class, we learned that a loop of wire with current can act as a self inductor.

Just to refresh my memory:
A loop of wire carrying current has a magnetic field around it due to current, however if the current changes, the magnetic field changes. This change in magnetic field makes the wire induce a current in the direction such that it opposes the change in magnetic field. Thus the induced current is in the direction opposite of the direction of the change in current.
Thus a loop of wire is a self-inductor since it does not require any external magnetic field to induce a current, it just requires a change in current which causes a change in magnetic field.

1) Is this correct? Please correct me if I am wrong anywhere, since I'm just refreshing my memory.

2) My question: While a loop of wire can be a self-inductor, can a straight wire also be a self-inductor?

3) Another question: I also learned current can be induced if there is a magnetic field and a loop of wire rotates, or its area changes. In addition, current is induced if the magnetic field changes.
By "magnetic field changes" does that mean the strength of the magnetic field changes?

Hopefully this can be answered in simple terms.

Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Inductance happens when there are charges in a changing magnetic field.
If a wire loops back on itself, and it has a current, then part of the wire is in the magnetic field of another part of the wire. This does not happen for straight wires.

By "magnetic field changes" does that mean the strength of the magnetic field changes?
... it means the magnetic flux changes... this usually means the magnetic field changes.

When you are first introduced the electricity and magnetism, it is taught as a collection of separate formulae and phenomena. As you advance, the different ideas get unified. To get a more complete picture, look at Maxwell's equations.
 
Simon Bridge said:
Inductance happens when there are charges in a changing magnetic field.
If a wire loops back on itself, and it has a current, then part of the wire is in the magnetic field of another part of the wire. This does not happen for straight wires.

... it means the magnetic flux changes... this usually means the magnetic field changes.

When you are first introduced the electricity and magnetism, it is taught as a collection of separate formulae and phenomena. As you advance, the different ideas get unified. To get a more complete picture, look at Maxwell's equations.

Thank you for the response.

That makes sense. In a loop of wire, for example, the opposite side of the wire of one part would create what would be like an external magnetic field to that part of wire. That's how I understand your explanation.

To your response with regard to changing magnetic field: This leads me to another question: Will changing the strength of the magnetic field induce current?
 
"2) My question: While a loop of wire can be a self-inductor, can a straight wire also be a self-inductor?"
A straight wire does have self inductance.
 
Meir Achuz said:
"2) My question: While a loop of wire can be a self-inductor, can a straight wire also be a self-inductor?"
A straight wire does have self inductance.


Thank you. Seems to contradict what Simon said. Hmm which answer is correct?
 
I don't think it is contradictory - I just left out a situation ;)
Meir's answer is part of that "more complete picture" that I mentioned at the end of my reply.

What education level do you need the answers for?
 
overtak3n said:
To your response with regard to changing magnetic field: This leads me to another question: Will changing the strength of the magnetic field induce current?
Yes - this is how generators work.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html

A time-varying magnetic field produces an electric field.
A time varying electric field produces a magnetic field.
 
The self inductance of a straight wire of length s and diameter d in mm, is LuF = 0.2 * s * ( Loge( 4 * s / d ) – ¾ )
 
Simon Bridge said:
Yes - this is how generators work.
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/electric/farlaw.html

A time-varying magnetic field produces an electric field.
A time varying electric field produces a magnetic field.

So a changing magnetic field doesn't necessarily mean changing magnetic flux, it could mean changing magnetic field strength? Are those the same thing, no?

By time varying electric field, are you referring to current?

As for which education level, college but I just wanted simple answers that answer the question :biggrin:
 
  • #10
1. What is the definition of a magnetic field.
2. No. A time varying electric may exist in a region of space where there are no charges.
3. What counts as simple depends on the education level ;) Have you had a look at Maxwells eqs yet?
 
  • #11
1. Space around which there exists a magnetic force (I'm assuming it can vary in strength too)
3. Yep.
 
  • #12
1. Erm OK for now, consider: "What is the definition of magnetic flux?"
3. In maxwell's equatons, the symbol "j" is the current density. You'll see equations with thatn in it, as well as time varying E and B.
2. In maxwel, ##\rho## is the charge density - you can still get sensible solutions for ##\rho=0##.

The easiest form to see the relations and appreciate how they hang together is the differential form.
 
  • #13
Simon Bridge said:
1. Erm OK for now, consider: "What is the definition of magnetic flux?"
3. In maxwell's equatons, the symbol "j" is the current density. You'll see equations with thatn in it, as well as time varying E and B.
2. In maxwel, ##\rho## is the charge density - you can still get sensible solutions for ##\rho=0##.

The easiest form to see the relations and appreciate how they hang together is the differential form.

1. I think it's the magnetic field passing through a surface.

Thank you for helping. The physics course I took only required integral calculus. I still need to complete my math courses before I fully understand differential equations :cool:
 
  • #14
So you can see that magnetic field and magnetic flux are related.
Do you know the mathematical relation that links them?
... once you have that, you should be able to answer your own question ;)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_flux

You should still be able to read the differential form ... where ##\Delta x## is a change in x, and ##\delta x## is a small change in x, you read the "dx" notation to be an extremely small change in x. i.e. acceleration is the rate if change of velocity ... which is written: $$\vec a =\frac{d\vec v}{dt}$$ ... the integral form would be $$\vec v = \int \vec a(t) \; dt$$ ... you should be able to get the idea by replacing the d's with deltas.

In Maxwell's equations the symbol ##\nabla## is used a lot - that just denotes a change in the variable with an extremely small change in space.

But you will need to complete your math courses to have a chance to understand some of the connections between electricity and magnetism yeah.
 
  • #15
Thank you Simon.

Is the symbol ∇ used in Maxwell's equations the same as the symbol ∇ used in calculus for gradient?
 
  • #16
Pretty much. In Cartesian coordinates: $$\vec \nabla = \begin{pmatrix}\frac{\partial}{\partial x}\\ \frac{\partial}{\partial y}\\ \frac{\partial}{\partial z} \end{pmatrix}$$... which allows it to be used with dot and cross products on vector functions. Recall ##\vec E = E_x(x,y,z)\hat\imath + E_y(x,y,z)\hat\jmath + E_z(x,y,z)\hat k## ... which is kinda difficult to use the grad operation on.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Del
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
152
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K