Can a Teenage Engineering Society Change the Future of Science and Engineering?

  • Thread starter Thread starter jeffonfire
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Engineering
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the establishment of a science and engineering society for teenagers, exploring the implications of using the term "engineering" in the society's name and the qualifications associated with it. Participants share their thoughts on how to improve the initiative and the importance of fostering interest in engineering among young people.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express support for the idea of a teenage science and engineering society, praising the initiative.
  • Concerns are raised about the use of the term "engineering," with some suggesting it implies a level of qualification that teenagers may not possess, proposing alternatives like "designers."
  • Others argue that the term "engineer" can be applied more broadly and that practical experience can qualify someone as an engineer, regardless of formal education.
  • Disagreements arise regarding the definition of an engineer versus a designer, with some emphasizing the necessity of a degree while others advocate for a more inclusive understanding based on skills and experience.
  • Some participants suggest incorporating terms like "aspiring" or "future" in the society's name to clarify the members' status.
  • There is a discussion about the potential negative implications of credentialism and the perception of titles in the engineering field.
  • A few participants note that the conversation has diverged from the original topic of the society.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the appropriateness of the term "engineering" for the society's name, with multiple competing views on the qualifications necessary to use the title. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the definitions and implications of engineering versus design.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the lack of legal implications associated with the title "designer," while others point out the legal restrictions on using "engineer" in professional contexts. The discussion reflects varying personal experiences and interpretations of professional titles.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals interested in youth engagement in STEM fields, discussions on professional titles and qualifications in engineering, and those exploring the dynamics of informal educational societies may find this discussion relevant.

jeffonfire
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I have started a science and engineering society for teenagers and am wondering what others think of the idea. The site is http://teenscisocity.webs.com/" What do you think of the idea, how can I improve it?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I think it is a great idea and kudos to you for starting something like that.

From my "tight wad" side, the only criticism I have is that I can't say I am for you using the term "engineering" since it implies that you are engineers. Obviously, since you are teens this is not possible. I would be happy if you changed the word to 'designers'.

Any way you look at it, I think you are doing a good thing and wish you luck.
 
OP, great idea!
the term engineer is being used more often for non degree'd titles
IMHO, I think designers (in my mind) is someone who doesn't get into the real "nuts and bolts" as much as engineers do
kind of like the automotive term "stylists"
now start adding simple cheap (under $50) projects and plans to your site, and you have a winner

great to see young people involved in designing and building stuff!

dr
 
Last edited by a moderator:
And why am a not a engineer?
 
What is the difference between a designer, as used above, and an engineer? What does professional mean?

Your betters/bosses/instructors tell you when you are an engineer.

I graduated from HS and worked the next thirty years learning about and eventually directing nuclear power plant operations, but I was an 'engineer' only to the extent that my employer certified. http://www.navsea.navy.mil/shipyards/norfolk/nnsy/NuclearTED.aspx

Your work will be improved when you are confident and proud enough to use your real name.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Yea, I am gradually changing my account names to my real name. Would you consider one to be an engineer because that is his occupation or because he has that degree?
 
jeffonfire said:
And why am a not a engineer?

Generally to be called an engineer, you need at least a 4-year degree. Otherwise, you would generally be classified as a Technician. That's how it works in industry, anyways.

Kudos from me as well for the iniative to work on this. Keep it up!
 
  • #10
Engineer is neither occupation ('cept locomotive driver) nor degree. Like 'scientist', it is a way of thinking.
 
  • #11
I only have a HS dip. but have had engineer in my job title. I am not dergee's as a scientist, but am a metrologist. I consider myself a self taught engineer/scientist/technician/mechanic/chef
(and I have also ran a locomotive
per google
en·gi·neer (nj-nîr)
n.
1. One who is trained or professionally engaged in a branch of engineering.
2. One who operates an engine.
3. One who skillfully or shrewdly manages an enterprise.

There is a real problem, which I have dealt with my whole life and that is the attitude some people have that persons without a "shingle" are somehow "lesser beings"
It irritates me to no end. I have seen guys with "on line/after work" degrees that couldn't built their way out aof a wet paperbag, and they get treated better than the tech they go to for all the answers.
if you design something that works, you are an engineer, if you build it too, you are one step up

dr

ps I mean no disrespect to all the persons who have gone to school and gotten a degree, it is a commendable committment.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
What a crock of BS. I guess since you can put a bandaid on your finger you are an MD or an RN? If you build something that works, fine. You have common sense. You do not engage the area of engineering. You do nothing that defines what an engineer does and have very little of the knowledge base an engineer strives to develop. You are a "designer" that got lucky plain and simple (I know a lot of designers that would be mad at me for giving you that title as well) .

I am a definite proponent of getting companies that give non-degreed individuals engineer titles penalties. This has gotten completely out of hand and one of the reasons I got out of the automotive industry where this is rampant. As someone who has put in the time, money and effort to get a proper engineering education, I find it nothing
short of insulting that you think that you are equivalent in this manner.

I have no idea where this trend started, but the notion that people "deserve" a title that they haven't earned through proper channels is, quite frankly, self-serving, presumptuous and rude.
 
  • #13
Credentialism is a definite problem that results from the democratization of our language and the injection of self-esteem in education. In the limit we see job offerings in the skilled/technical classified section of newspaper want ads for 'nail technicians'.

We ex-Navy nukes had to read resumes of the degreed applicants for our jobs. Ugggh!

The OP's 'Teenage engineering society' thread has been hijacked.
 
  • #14
Doug Huffman said:
The OP's 'Teenage engineering society' thread has been hijacked.
Absolutely true. Back on track.
 
  • #15
FredGarvin said:
Absolutely true. Back on track.

agreed, this is a discussion for another time and place (or not)

it is nice to see how passionate we all are about what we do for a living

dr
 
  • #16
FredGarvin said:
From my "tight wad" side, the only criticism I have is that I can't say I am for you using the term "engineering" since it implies that you are engineers. Obviously, since you are teens this is not possible. I would be happy if you changed the word to 'designers'.
Pre-high school graduation, I'm not sure I would call someone a "designer" either, though I realize there are no legal implications to the title, as there are "engineer" (Ie, you can't put the word "engineer" in a business title unless you have a state licensed professional engineer as a principal).

All this could be solved by the usage of the word "aspiring" somewhere in the title or mission statement.
 
  • #17
or "future"

dr
 
  • #18
Not to sound like a jerk, but I'd suggest spelling the name of your site correctly if you want to spred the word effectively and show that you're a serious group.

Creating a society where people of similar interests can get together and do what they enjoy doing is a great idea, especially in the engineering profession where many people don't make it past the "weed-out" classes in the first few years of college. I swear they try to make those as boring as humanly possible. Getting people interested in it at an early age might help them build up the momentum to overcome them, and get to work with the really fun stuff later on.

I also agree with other posters in that you should probably add on "aspiring" or "future" to the name of your group, as it would more accurately describe who you are (and avoid angering these volatile physorg people!)
 
  • #19
danman5000 said:
(and avoid angering these volatile physorg people!)

it was only spirited discussion
that why this place is so fun

dr
 
  • #20
O , yes a good debate is always fun!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
3K